Jiang says constructing a valid psychohistory AI would require at least 50 to 100 years because the model must be repeatedly tested against predictions.
Topic brief
A Jiang Lens evidence brief for this topic, built from source tags, transcript matches, and linked source refs.
Validation
He says failed predictions require revising the predictions and analysis rather than keeping the model fixed.
Showing 8 evidence items
No matching evidence on this topic page.
Key Notes
He says failed predictions require revising the predictions and analysis rather than keeping the model fixed.
Timestamped Evidence
"Okay. So, Sally asked the question, like, how do you construct this? This AI. Okay? And so, for this AI to be valid, okay,..."
"If they're not correct, what you have to do is go away. You have to change these predictions, okay? And analysis. Okay? Does that..."
"...science right science is negation of the spiritual world and the validation of the material world if you cannot see it it must be..."
"...me on BuyMeACoffee. I really appreciate all the donations. It's real validation of my work. Okay, all right. So thank you so much. And..."
"...enjoy it that process affirms your individuality and your creativity your validation basically. Okay? Alright. I would have been for you the mediator between..."
Relevant Lectures And Readings
The final class turns collapse into an assignment: build a democratic psychohistory that can model war, correct history, answer great-man edge cases, and still preserve the human heart that wants to love, create, learn,...
Related Topics
How To Use And Cite This Page
This topic page is a discovery surface. For generated synthesis, cite the human-readable source reading or lens page. For Jiang-spoken claims, cite the transcript segment, source ref, and YouTube timestamp. Raw text and Markdown mirrors are fallback surfaces for tools that cannot read this HTML page.