He says failed predictions require revising the predictions and analysis rather than keeping the model fixed.
Topic brief
A Jiang Lens evidence brief for this topic, built from source tags, transcript matches, and linked source refs.
Model Revision
He says failed predictions require revising the predictions and analysis rather than keeping the model fixed.
Showing 8 evidence items
No matching evidence on this topic page.
Key Notes
Jiang says that if Trump does not pick Haley or loses in November, the proper response is to return to the analysis and change the model.
Timestamped Evidence
"Okay. So, Sally asked the question, like, how do you construct this? This AI. Okay? And so, for this AI to be valid, okay,..."
"If they're not correct, what you have to do is go away. You have to change these predictions, okay? And analysis. Okay? Does that..."
"Okay? So you know what? It's possible that in August, Trump will pick someone else, okay? Possibly someone named J.D. Vance, okay? The only..."
"So that it's much more reflective and accurate, okay? Does that make sense? Okay? And that's how we try to think critically about the..."
Relevant Lectures And Readings
The final class turns collapse into an assignment: build a democratic psychohistory that can model war, correct history, answer great-man edge cases, and still preserve the human heart that wants to love, create, learn,...
A dated May 2024 election model: Biden's 2020 coalition weakens, the suburbs become the hinge, and Trump can win by turning Nikki Haley from enemy into evidence that he has changed.
Related Topics
How To Use And Cite This Page
This topic page is a discovery surface. For generated synthesis, cite the human-readable source reading or lens page. For Jiang-spoken claims, cite the transcript segment, source ref, and YouTube timestamp. Raw text and Markdown mirrors are fallback surfaces for tools that cannot read this HTML page.