Glossary
A multi-factor admissions regime presented as character evaluation but used, in Jiang’s account, to preserve elite control.
Topic brief
A Jiang Lens evidence brief for this topic, built from source tags, transcript matches, and linked source refs.
holistic admissions
A multi-factor admissions regime presented as character evaluation but used, in Jiang’s account, to preserve elite control.
Showing 5 evidence items
No matching evidence on this topic page.
Key Notes
diagnosis
Holistic admissions and character assessment were built as discretionary screens that could preserve alumni power and exclude disfavored groups while appearing morally selective.
Timestamped Evidence
Transcript
"for them to get in they have to take a test and also they're in class with smart people people okay so now harvard..."
Transcript
"good we need people who are manly who are strong who are brave we need white people okay so they develop this holistic system..."
Relevant Lectures And Readings
Reading
The lecture turns meritocracy from a school virtue into a trauma machine: Harvard invents selection as power preservation, Yale trains insecurity as ambition, and the winners become actors who can promise goodness while serving...
Sources:
Reading
Transcript
YouTube
Data
Related Topics
How To Use And Cite This Page
This topic page is a discovery surface. For generated synthesis, cite the human-readable source reading or lens page. For Jiang-spoken claims, cite the transcript segment, source ref, and YouTube timestamp. Raw text and Markdown mirrors are fallback surfaces for tools that cannot read this HTML page.