Jiang's adopted phrase for an incentive structure in which the military-industrial complex profits more from perpetual conflict than from decisive success.
Topic brief
A Jiang Lens evidence brief for this topic, built from source tags, transcript matches, and linked source refs.
never-ending wars
A transcript-matched topic anchored by excerpts such as "...not to have successful wars. The point is to have never -ending wars. Because what wars do is they transfer taxpayer money into the..."
Showing 16 evidence items
No matching evidence on this topic page.
Topic Scope And Freshness
A transcript-matched topic anchored by excerpts such as "...not to have successful wars. The point is to have never -ending wars. Because what wars do is they transfer taxpayer money into the..."
Key Notes
Jiang argues that the American military-industrial complex is a corrupt institution that benefits from permanent warfare, invoking Julian Assange's line that the point is not successive wars but never-ending wars.
Timestamped Evidence
"...not to have successive wars. The point is to have never -ending wars. So I mean, I don't think people recognize the corruption in..."
"...not to have successful wars. The point is to have never -ending wars. Because what wars do is they transfer taxpayer money into the..."
"...is not to win wars. The point is to have never -ending wars, which allows the military industrial complex to transfer American taxpayer money..."
"...is not to win wars. The point is to have never -ending wars which allows the Military Industrial Complex to transfer American taxpayer money..."
"...terror is not to have successful wars but to have never -ending wars where the military industrial complex can steal as much as it..."
"...not to have successful wars. The point is to have never -ending wars so that a military -industrial complex, this transnational security system can..."
"...and what he's saying is we're moving towards continuous war, never ending war, which is what will happen if you destroy the."
Relevant Lectures And Readings
The apparent U.S.-Iran war is recast as an imperial succession crisis.
This lecture turns a current conflict into a strategic exercise: the war is too short to be explained as U.S.
Redacted asks Jiang whether the Iran war is already out of control.
The interview opens as a first-week war briefing and then keeps widening.
Mercouris opens by asking for predictive geopolitics rather than another issue-by-issue panel, and Jiang answers by folding Ukraine, Europe, Iran, China, and domestic American disorder into one machine.
Uberboyo pushes Jiang from geopolitics into demography, soft power, religion, bureaucracy, and aging.
Related Topics
How To Use And Cite This Page
This topic page is a discovery surface. For generated synthesis, cite the human-readable source reading or lens page. For Jiang-spoken claims, cite the transcript segment, source ref, and YouTube timestamp. Raw text and Markdown mirrors are fallback surfaces for tools that cannot read this HTML page.