Jiang calls attacks on civilian infrastructure war crimes or violations of international law, while explaining them as the move actors make when they need more pressure to win.
Topic brief
A Jiang Lens evidence brief for this topic, built from source tags, transcript matches, and linked source refs.
International LAW
Jiang calls attacks on civilian infrastructure war crimes or violations of international law, while explaining them as the move actors make when they need more pressure to win.
Showing 7 evidence items
No matching evidence on this topic page.
Key Notes
Timestamped Evidence
"...Okay? And this is a war crime or this goes against international law because you're attacking civilians. But that's what you do when you..."
"...the ceasefire, an illegal American blockade that has no legitimacy under international law and is a complete violation of the ceasefire agreement, demanded that..."
"...no good reason, kidnapped a president of Venezuela, which is against international law, and then brought him back to New York City where he..."
"...this is obviously an invasion of American territory. This goes against international law. But when the students did this, there was so much public..."
"...wrong. It attacked an embassy of Iran in Damascus. That's against international law. And Iran, to save face, to pursue justice, threw some rockets..."
Relevant Lectures And Readings
A source-grounded reading of Jiang’s law of escalation: the actor with the biggest weapon can still lose if the weaker actor has calibration, legitimacy, options, and a way to make the bully destroy himself.
Related Topics
How To Use And Cite This Page
This topic page is a discovery surface. For generated synthesis, cite the human-readable source reading or lens page. For Jiang-spoken claims, cite the transcript segment, source ref, and YouTube timestamp. Raw text and Markdown mirrors are fallback surfaces for tools that cannot read this HTML page.