Jiang says the continuing objection is that an infinite God appears free to choose any redemptive mechanism, so selecting the punishment of an innocent Jesus still feels unjust.
Topic brief
A Jiang Lens evidence brief for this topic, built from source tags, transcript matches, and linked source refs.
Divine choice
A transcript-matched topic anchored by excerpts such as "Okay, right, okay. So this is the question, okay? If you are God, and you are infinite and eternal, why did you have to..."
Showing 3 evidence items
No matching evidence on this topic page.
Topic Scope And Freshness
A transcript-matched topic anchored by excerpts such as "Okay, right, okay. So this is the question, okay? If you are God, and you are infinite and eternal, why did you have to..."
Key Notes
Timestamped Evidence
"Okay, right, okay. So this is the question, okay? If you are God, and you are infinite and eternal, why did you have to..."
Relevant Lectures And Readings
Paradise first appears as receptivity rather than rank, then the lecture widens into vows, memory, resurrection, original sin, and Jiang's culminating wager that God created humanity because perfection alone cannot imagine.
Related Topics
How To Use And Cite This Page
This topic page is a discovery surface. For generated synthesis, cite the human-readable source reading or lens page. For Jiang-spoken claims, cite the transcript segment, source ref, and YouTube timestamp. Raw text and Markdown mirrors are fallback surfaces for tools that cannot read this HTML page.