🔴 Jiang Xueqin Warns: The End of The World Has Begun (Here's Why)

right now there are three major visions for the world okay there's a technique model which makes north america uh greater north america the focus of all world politics there's pashudeika which makes the levant israel the focus and then there's the third rome uh which is actually a dugan's model and the idea of the third rome is that moscow would you write you unite the eurasian continent uh in creating new new era of world peace okay so these are the three competing visions that we have right now and all three are working towards this eschatological vision okay so the difference is this the difference is what what era becomes the center of gravity right so

you're watching capital cause my name is danny it is april 16th 2026 and my guest today is professor jang big fan favorite on the channel from the predictive history youtube channel professor jang thank you so much for coming on my friend thanks danny yeah well let's just dive right in first of all thank you so much for your time we do appreciate it we do know that you have been uh you know you've been working really hard lately making all the rounds on all the big podcasts so we do appreciate the time you've put in um to make time for us as well uh so let's go ahead and kick it off with the latest developments in the iran war it seems to be it seems to have been put on ice relatively speaking um there hasn't been any big major developments in a few days now we're about you know this is thursday at

the time of this recording we're four days removed four or five days removed from the islamabad negotiation um is this the has has this iran war been kind of put aside to maybe until the midterms um to be revamped up at some other point in time what's going on here uh professor jang right so i

think the ceasefire is a reset uh because americans were clearly losing the war they were on the back foot and this ceasefire gives a chance for americans to represent reposition themselves as opposed to literally being at least starting time that had dedicated el bottiil today i think the um соврем movement towards full cooperation, full military cooperation of Indonesia, which will allow America to control the Strait of Malacca, right? So now the Iranians control the Strait of Hormuz. So the counter would be for Americans to take over the Strait of Malacca and China gets about 80 % - Which is the biggest choke point in the world, right?

It is the biggest choke point in the world. It would collapse the East Asian economies if America were to choke it off. China gets about 80 % of its oil from the Strait of Malacca, right? So the Strait of Malacca is a heavily contested territory. So that's one movement. Another major movement that we've been seeing is that the George H. W. Bush, the third aircraft carrier is now moving towards the theater and it's bringing about 10,000 Marines into theater and that will bring it to a total of 60,000 troops in theater. And when you have that many troops, you're going to use them for ground incursion of some sort, right? So that's number two. Number three is that in the home front in America, Trump has asked for $1.5 trillion in next year's Pentagon budget. He'll probably get it. There's now an automatic draft registration starting in December for young American men.

The Pentagon has asked Detroit, General Motors, and Ford to start war munitions manufacturing. So it seems as though the American home front is going up for a long, long war of attrition. Again, the Pentagon has asked for $1.5 trillion. And that's not enough. And then Trump has announced a naval blockade against Iran. So the American Navy will not go near the Strait of Hormuz because then you're within range of Iranian ballistic missiles and drone strikes. But what they can do is they can embargo ships in the Indian Ocean. And that's exactly what's been happening since the naval blockade has come into effect. And basically by saying that we won't pull out of the sea, it means that we can't do naval blockade against the of humus but same within the indian ocean what america is really doing is saying that we are going to impose a worldwide blockade against any enemy ships that we

deem breaking sanctions so this could include russian uh shadow fleet uh tankers this can include chinese this can include iranian uh so if you if the americans deem you to be aiding and abetting the iranians they will board your ship or um turn it back so there's been a lot of movement and what we're seeing is that this war is sort of expanding into a global conflict in the oceans uh primarily over energy access primary primarily over trade access now some people are postulating

that maybe this was done on purpose not just to hurt iran but also to kind of reroute naval traffic to america uh 127 plus ships are now heading towards the gulf of america gulf of mexico whatever you want to call it and some are saying this is oh well this is 5d chess did they purposely know that i mean did they know beforehand that iran was going to shut down the straight because iran was telegraphing it right did they purposely have things happen this way just so they can reroute maritime traffic to satisfy america's interest more so donald trump

if you go back to the 1980s um and just look at his speeches about foreign global trade about globalization his position has remained consistent for the past few decades which is that america is being uh manipulated america is being scammed in this global trade where um the american consumer is taking advantage of and america is buying too many things from the world and the world is using these profits to fund their welfare state especially europe uh he's talked about attacking iran and stealing stealing iran's oil since the 1980s uh there's a there's this interview with barbara walters where he says you know like if you were in charge and this is like the late 80s he'd go and take over karg island right because because all of iran's oil is in karg island so uh trump he's very much a mercantilist he is very much a person who believes that uh global trade does not

benefit america he is american firster so during during the early stages of a second term he's trying to impose tariffs on the world right and the supreme court's struck the service down saying that only congress has the authority to impose tariffs and you can make the argument that these past few months especially with the kidnapping of maduro in venezuela especially with one -third of american naval assets patrolling the caribbean especially with this attack against iran what trump is trying to do is militarily impose america first which is basically to onshore manufacturing and resources development back into america and force the world to buy america's oil and if that is in fact the grand plan then a lot of what's been happening

these past few minutes a few months makes a lot of sense now i i had a good friend of mine simon michaud on a few days back uh he's you know he's got a engineer a phd in engineering and uh he's got his geology degree as well so he looks at the world through an engineering background and um he also has sources in south america and he's saying that some of his sources were telling him that these south american countries were being instructed by america to make their oil deals make make their deals with venezuela to go to venezuela for their oil so it seems like venezuela is being shaped as the point person in south america um going forward to do as as an american proxy so to speak so um

last december the trump white house issued the national security strategy and if you just read it uh it's very clear what the strategy is which is america will treat the western hemisphere as its own territory right this is the trump corollary to the monroe doctrine and so all the resources including the lithium triangle in south america which china heavily depends on for its ai and ev industries including all the oil in venezuela they belong to america and so um everything that we're seeing right now fits into a national security strategy including trump's uh talks of aniseing greenland including trump's aggression towards canada including trump's discussion of using special forces against mexican cartels his um rhetoric against cuba the embargo against cuba you know you know it's very possible that within the next month there'll be military action against cuba right so it's all part of this national security strategy that trump has laid out in

uh december and the other thing that about the national security strategy which is very important is that trump talks about monetizing america's control over the seas right so rather than the american navy protecting global trade the american navy will now impose tariffs on those who want to trade now someone will call this piracy but from the trump perspective why should america pay for um free trade over the seas let the world pay pay for it so again this is all part of the national security strategy yeah so here's a

screenshot of i think you brought this up in your one of your latest lectures professor ding this is the technate of america can you explain what we're looking at here because it looks like uh an entire block of north america the entire block of north america and the southern the northern tip of south america here um what is the tech native america well this plan was

developed in 1930s um and this called for america to transition from a democracy which caused things like you know the great the stock market crash and the great depression um to a technocracy which is a system run by technocrats using data statistics in order to make the best informed decisions basically engineers and the plan calls for um america to extend into a continental fortress and annex canada mexico greenland colombia venezuela and then this becomes a self -sufficient fortress which allows america to follow develop develop economically as well as trade with the rest of the world. So this is something called a technate. It's something that Elon Musk is very much in favor of. In fact, it was Elon Musk's grandfather who was one of the early proponents of the technate. So you can make the argument that this is very much part of the grand vision for America in the 21st century. And certainly it

makes sense because look at all the countries that Trump has got into fights with these past six months, right? Canada, Greenland, Nicaragua, Honduras, Cuba, Venezuela, Colombia, Mexico. If you just look at the map, it's all in the technate. It's

interesting because these plans, I mean, this is a plan of like what from the 1920s? 1930s. 1930s, yeah. So if you look back at the beginnings of the globalist movement with Rockefeller, with Morgan, and all the others that started like the Bilderberg Group and all this stuff, they started like the Bilderberg Group and all this stuff, they started like the Bilderberg Group and all this stuff, they had envisioned like multiple unions across the world, like the European Union, North American Union, et cetera. Is what Trump trying to build that akin to the European Union model? Or is it more so a model where America is at the heart of this technate and is essentially in the driver's seat where Canada, Mexico, the rest of these countries would just be subordinate to America? You see what I'm saying? Because the globalist model was that you would have no sovereignty, no sovereign government, and it would just be controlled by a bunch of technocrats.

Is what Donald Trump doing that? Or is it more so where America is like the imperial nation that controls all these other nations? Right,

so America, so Trump is consistent in that he's very anti -globalist. He thinks that organized like the United Nations, the WTO exists in order to pilfer for American people. So what Trump wants to do is re -center America from a focus on its finance, to a focus on resources and manufacturing, right? And he's been trying to do that in this, starting in his first term. And he tried to do that by imposing terrorists, by starting this trade war with China. And there were a lot of issues with this. So now his main plan is to start a global conflict that would force America to re -industrialize in order to fight these wars overseas. And with all these wars overseas, the world will be dependent on America, for its resources, which will motivate these companies to go and extract resources from Venezuela, right? So in January, after Trump kidnapped Maduro, he convened a meeting of all executives with Chevron, XL Mobile.

And basically, Trump's like, you know, Venezuela is ours for the take in. And the world executives rebuffed him and said, no, well, we would have spent five years and $20 billion in order to develop the Venezuela industry. So we don't want to do that. And he's like, well, you know what, we're going to do that. We don't really see what the benefit is for us. Well, you know, if the entire world lacks oil, because the GCC has been destroyed, if the Strait of Hormuz is still closed, then they would be financially incentivized to go and start to develop Venezuela's oil industry. So I think this is very much part of Trump's vision that America will become the resource and manufacturing hub of the world while the world is in flames because of these wars that America started.

Is this kind of an under the table agreement between the major powers, China, Russia, America, maybe to some extent Iran as well, to a much lesser degree, where America would just acquire the Western Hemisphere? And if so, if not, then, I mean, can't some opposing power just lay the foundations for civil strife in the South American country? Because they do have big Marxist blocs. Even if they have been switched over to the American side, there have been these communist blocs that have been deeply embedded. So I think that's a good point. I think that's a good point.

So I think there will be a lot of opposition towards Trump's plan, mainly from the globalists, right? When I mean globalists, I mean the city of London, Wall Street, who control the EU, who control NATO. This is still a very powerful force in the world. They still control the deep state in America. So if Trump moves ahead with his plan, then we can expect economic sabotage in America, where the globalists are going to intentionally sabotage, destroy the American economy, cause a crash in the American economy, and then maybe organize protests, anti -war protests, which would possibly lead to a civil war. So I think that right now, Trump is trying to move towards a national draft. And we can expect that if that were the case, then these billionaires, these oligarchs would happily fund national protests against the national draft, because they see that as possibly a pressure point on Trump's plan.

Do you think that this is an organic civil war between two deep state factions, the Trump -allied faction and then the legacy globalists? Or is it a simulacrum, meaning that it's all a staged play to where it's meant to create an agreed -upon solution, problem -reaction solution, Hegelian dialectic, thesis, antithesis, and synthesis? Sometimes these intelligence agencies use that methodology to achieve their goals. This is something we were talking about a few episodes back, again, with Simon and Simon Michaud, was that he had two models. One was that either it's completely organic, there is a civil war going on between the deep states, the Trump deep state and the legacy deep state, or it's all fake. It's all a fake fight meant to come across as a civil war to bring about a certain solution. What do you think of this?

If you just look at history, when an empire is declined, you always have different factions competing against each other for power. The historian Peter Turchin, he writes about this, he calls it elite overproduction. Over time, what caused an empire decline is that you have too many elite. The elite are essentially parasites. You become a parasite if you're able to monopolize political power. Think about the 2008 great financial crisis, where it was clearly Wall Street who caused the crisis through criminal activity. Not only did the government not punish them, but the government actually bailed them out and made them even more powerful in Washington DC. That's the idea of elite power, where you can control the apparatus of political power in order to obtain rents, in order to engage in rent -seeking behavior. The problem, though, is that now you have emerging elites to challenge the financial oligarchies. For example, Silicon Valley, artificial intelligence, these people, including Christian nationalists, including other different factions as well, America, MAGA.

What we're seeing right now is a clash of these different political factions. Maybe before, 100 years ago, I would have said that eventually one of these factions would emerge as the synthesis. Looking back, we could say, well, clearly this was orchestrated, even though it was organic. But I think we've reached a point in human development where we are so overextended, where the balance is so unsustainable that it's going to be a freefall, meaning it's going to be a civil war and it's not going to stop until everything is destroyed. Think of the Bronze Age collapse in about the year 1000 BCE. But also, think of the fall of the Roman Republic, where once the Roman Republic starts to fall, it never really stopped falling. Yes, I understand that there were these emperors who came into power, but their reigns didn't last very long, maybe 20 years at most.

So America is going to head towards this direction where America is so overextended in terms of debt, in terms of political polarization, in terms of elite overproduction, that you might have decades of civil war between different factions. Now, it's possible these different factions will change over time, but we can expect that once civil war starts, it never really stops.

Yeah, one can kind of make the claim that everything that's going on in the world is pretty much on the basis of this elite civil war that's ongoing in the United States.

Exactly. Exactly. That's exactly what's going on, because you understand how powerful America is. We've never had a situation where one country is able to control the entire world. Look, all these nations around the world, like China, the GCC, Venezuela, Europe, they're clearly vassal states of America. And so this war that we can just broadly say is between nationalists and globalists, maybe between Wall Street and Silicon Valley, finance and AI, I mean, it's a very stark economy. It's oversimplified, but it's useful to think about. This is what's leading to so much conflict around the world, because what they're doing here, is externalized in this conflict because they cannot be seen as fighting at home and wouldn't

every nation state be a vassal state to this to these entities i mean i'm i'm calling them entities i don't know what else to call organizations groups whatever you want to call them even the united states because the united states shifts its uh you know objectives every four or four eight years depending on who's in office um and that's why we're seeing civil wars

throughout the world right so if you look at what's been happening in china there's a civil war going on look happening happening if you look at what's been happening in russia there's civil war going on europe civil war it's these civil wars are going over the place uh they have not escalated into open open you know street violence yet but they will at some point what's the civil war in china and russia well between the nationalists and globalists you have these very nationalistic leaders like putin and c who've come to power and one who want to maintain and protect national sovereignty and then you have other elites who have been for a long time uh that for a long time they've been co -opted by wall street and the state of london by global finance and they've shipped their um money their families overseas and this is a situation not just unique to russia and

china it's it's it's most of the world and even iran too i mean the reformists

have been kind of more allied with the cia and the liberal faction whereas they've been that's right with the uh the irgc and the hardliners that's right that's exactly right interesting did you notice that um in trump won his first term the media was a lot more harsher on him than they are now like in trump won from 2016 to 2020 like he literally could not do anything right it literally was trump derangement syndrome nowadays i mean they're pretty they've gone pretty easy on him like there's not like this uh this trump derangement syndrome anymore there's the occasional like you know shot at trump but it's nothing like it was in 2016 to 2020 because it's insane um what do you think has gone on there has has have the media been captured as well by the trump faction or what do you think all right quick break here because if you're buying gold or

silver the normal way you're probably overpaying by a lot and that's because most retail dealers quietly tack on these huge markups sometimes 10 sometimes 20 sometimes even 30 percent and you don't even notice it it's like paying a hundred and fifteen dollars or a hundred dollar bill doesn't make sense right so that's why i've been using the bullion standard pro it's a membership that basically lets you buy precious metals at real wholesale prices the same prices that dealers get so no inflated premiums no middleman games their platform updates every five seconds straight from mints and distributors so what you see is literally the real market and here's the crazy part if you buy something like this gold american eagle here's the amount of money you're going to be saving at the time of this recording at least so it basically pays for itself multiple folds on many occasions depending on what you buy and if

you try it out they're hooking up my viewers with an exclusive 10 off their first month just use promo code cosm10 at checkout that's c -o -s -m 10 at checkout so if you're stacking investing or just tired of getting hit with hidden markups check them out now in standard pro click on the link down below in the description box and use promo code cosm10

now let's get back to the video so in the first trump administration his election caught everyone by surprise uh if you go back to uh the republican primaries hillary clinton the clintons were going their way to root for trump they were doing a lot to help trump uh win that that nomination because they knew that hillary clinton would clinch the democratic nomination and she would be a historically unpopular candidate so they need someone from the republican faction who would be even more unfavorable unpopular than hillary clinton so they actively worked to promote uh trump's victory and so everyone was taken by surprise especially washington dc when trump won in 2016 and that first term everyone in washington dc did as much as possible to sabotage uh his um his administration including his own administration right i mean like like think about the turnover of her in that first administration compared with with like his second

administration there was russiagate um you know where uh the the mainstream media was was promoting this hoax that trump is a putin agent and there was just a lot of sabotage there was so much leaks during the first um administration so trump couldn't get anything done but then what happened was um trump lost to biden and you can make the argument like there was a lot of issues with that election in 2020 and the main issue was that the cult the elite coalesced against trump and the main reason why they coalesced against trump was they fought that trump would destroy the american empire trump was so bad uh on the international stage as compared with obama right so remember when obama first came into office he went to germany uh to give a speech there were 20 000 people lying uh outside to listen to his speech he went to egypt as his first foreign

tour right so obama is an you know he makes empire look good and trump's the opposite um so there's real concern that trump would destroy the american empire by pissing off of america's allies including europe uh including nato so there was a conspiracy well not conspiracy but but there was a consensus that this guy needed need to be gotten rid of but then fighting him in office and biden was actually worse for empire than trump because biden was ineffectual right so remember what happened in biden's um during the binding years was that putin invaded ukraine and biden did nothing because he was comatose um you know he should gone and rallied uh nato he should have uh rallied against putin and so the empire recognized that you can't have democrats in power anymore because the democrats are just these people are absolutely useless we regardless of what trump is trump is a strong man trump

and trump did say if he were in office it would not have invaded ukraine and he's absolutely right in that regard because putin could not have gauged trump's reaction properly whereas he knew exactly biden would have done nothing so um i think um the empire the deep state whatever okay had a conversation conversation with trump and at this time trump was bankrupt he was under siege because of law fair his house mar -a -lago was raided by the fbi uh his his his daughter ivanka basically abandoned him uh so so he was he he was he was he was he was he was he was he was he was he was he was he was he was he was he was he was he was he was he was he was in a lot of trouble and i think he made a deal with the deep state that when he came to power when he

came back into power then he would be the agent of empire basically a skateboard for empire who would promote um imperial interests around the world and that's exactly what he's been doing um these past uh couple years right and what's really striking is not only have the mainstream press no not only have they been more um uh reserved in a criticism of trump but the democrat Democrats have done nothing at all to stop Trump's imperial push, right? So this attack against Iran, which would have required congressional authority, Congress basically abstained. They delayed the vote until it was a fait accompli and the Democrats are trying to do as much as possible not to do anything. So it seems as though there's an agreement between the empire and Trump to basically enforce the empire upon the world, right? So before the empire, you could have the empire by consent and there's a goodwill towards America after World War II and after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

But if people don't want to do it by consent, they want to do it by force, which is what's happening today.

Yeah. Yeah. It definitely feels like the Soros Rockefeller faction has been defanged in a way because I mean, they're just not going as hard after him as they did the first term. You also have Marina Abramova. Do you know who she is? Yes. Yes, I do.

Yes, I do. Yes, I do.

So for people who don't know who she is, she's like, she's like this artist, this claimed artist last Satanist. He's been seen with Hillary Clinton and all these other elites. She had this to say about Trump. Pulling up. Well, she basically had videos not playing now for some reason. But she was saying that Trump was a chaos magician, essentially. That he brings. He creates the chaos to bring about the change in the world that they'd like that they want to see. Yeah. That's the Galilean dialectic.

Yeah. So. So what she means by that is that Trump is unique in America and that he's able to capture people's attention so that what needs to be done can be done backstage. Right. So under any under under any president, if they attack Iran, then everyone would be like, oh, this is clearly for oil. Right. Which is what happened in 2003 during the Iraq war. Right. When George W. Bush invaded Iraq, there were protests around the world saying this is clearly imperialistic. This is clear about oil today. First of all, there are no protests against this war against Iran, this unprovoked war of aggression. Second of all, everyone thinks for whatever reason, it's Trump's a moron because Netanyahu was able to trick Trump into war. Because Trump is a moron. That's magical. I mean, like, like, like the fact that he's able to just capture people's attention so that they're paralyzed, so that they're confused, so that they're almost so complicit in a process.

That's magical.

Yeah. So I got the video here for us to look at this one.

So this is her volume up. You hear it now? Yes. The Trump. Yes. President. I said, how is this possible is the best thing to happen? He said yes, because because he's so rational, he's so crazy. That's actually create that awakening that we finally wake up because before there will be another guy and another guy and everything was similar. But he's so different than anything else. So the actually. He's the magician who wakes us up to take.

Yeah. So there it is. He's a magician that's there to wake us up. Right.

Right, so let me explain her logic, okay? Her logic is this, when you look at the kind of empires, it's a very long process that might take centuries. And in this process, there's gonna be a lot of pain, a lot of suffering, and the leaders during this empire, they're really focused on trying to maintain stability and cohesion and coherence in this decline. And what you're saying is that's a wrong approach because if an empire's decline, if an empire is gonna decline naturally, make it decline fast. Make this process as accelerated as possible in order to end human suffering and allow for a new age to come into being. And that's what Trump is doing. Trump is first and foremost an accelerationist who is not controlling world events. All he's doing is speeding world events up dramatically. So this war against Iran was gonna happen sooner or later. If someone's gonna start this war against Iran, but Trump's doing it now.

And not only is he doing it now, but he's helping to accelerate things to a point where a new order must emerge from the old. And so that's why he's magical. Like no other person could have pulled this off.

Interesting. Again, I saw your latest, or one of your latest talks about the technate, and it seemed to be kind of at odds with the Pax Judaica model. Maybe it's just an alternative model. Because you never know which model is gonna come true. Right. Because in the Pax Judaica model, the way we discuss it, you have greater Israel and then you have a world government based in Jerusalem from there, and you'd have Pax Judaica where Israel would be at the center of the world. And the technate model, America would consolidate what we just saw, north and portions of South America, north central and portions of South America. And then I believe that there is like a Pax Iran element to it, the technate. Right. This is from the Alexander Dugan model. So what are the two differences between the two models?

Right. Okay. So right now there are three major visions for the world. Okay. There is a technate model, which makes North America, greater North America, the focus of all world politics. There's Pax Judaica, which makes the Levant, Israel, the focus. And then there's the third Rome, which is actually Dugan's model. And the idea of the third Rome is that Moscow, would unite the Eurasian continent in creating new, new, new era of world peace. Okay. So these are the three competing visions that we have right now. And all three are working towards this eschatological vision. Okay. So the difference is this, the difference is what, what era becomes the center of gravity, right? So in the technate model, you have Israel. What Israel is doing is, Israel is creating all this conflict in the Middle East. And if there's all this conflict in the Middle East, it's impossible for the world to trade with each other.

Right? Because the Levant is the pivot of the world. For Europe to access Africa, it has to go for the Levant. For Asia to access Africa, it also has to go for the Levant. Right? So in the technate model, Israel is just this pit bull empire, which is always causing problems. And it can never be tamed because of nuclear weapons. And because the, the, the Jews, the religious Jews who control Israel are just fanatics, and they will never stop until they've achieved their eschatological vision. Right? So that's the technate model. In the text Judaic model, Israel comes to peace with Iran at some point. And North America breaks out into civil war. Right? So now Pax Judaica becomes the center of the world because North America, to fight a civil war, now needs financing, armaments, resources from Pax Judaica. Also Pax Judaica is able to control Africa. And Africa, demographically, is the most resource rich area in the world.

In that, you know, they'll probably own this continent with young people. And so Pax Judaica can, basically enslave Africa and turn it into a resource colony for its worldwide control. Okay? So that's Pax Judaica. Third rule the vision is to seek peace with Israel at some point. And unify the, the competing, religions around the world including, including the Catholic religion, the Orthodox, the Islamic, and the Jewish. And fight again, against the Antichrist, which is material secularism, which is represented by China and the United States, okay? So these are the three different models of the world.

That would imply a rapprochement with China, between China and the United States. Excuse me? I mean, wouldn't that imply a rapprochement between America and China?

Yeah, so I think from an esoterical perspective, it is very likely that at some point, China and the United States will have a rapprochement, maybe as early as May. And the reason why is that in eschatology, the concern is not about material competition. It's about spiritual worldview. And the fact of the matter is that America and China are the two most dominant material cultures in the world today.

Interesting. Well, Israel definitely has an eschatological framework behind it. Well, not a framework, but there are factions that do have that, that do hold eschatological ideals. And America as well. I mean, you've got the Pete Hexeth and all of them. But does China have any sort of eschatology that they -

None at all, none at all. That's why China's not a factor. That's why eschatology never considers China, because China does not actually interfere or concerns itself with global events.

So which one of these three models, do you see most likely of, where do you see the evidence weighing heavily the most? Which one of these three models?

I would say that the most likely scenario is that these three models compete against each other and end up destroying the world. I think we're really into the Bronze Age collapse period, where the idea that a new world order is gonna emerge from the old, from the ashes of the old, I mean, it's just wishful thinking. I think like, if you just look at, just from a peer resource perspective, we are clearly, as a species, clearly over -leveraged. And we are running on borrowed time, right? So the example is, the Shui -Fu Moose has been closed. And so a third of the world's fertilizer has gone offline. And now it's planting season. And so we can expect starvation to be an issue, famine to be an issue. Over the next six months. What we need to recognize is that we are living on borrowed time. We've basically mortgaged the future. So the example is, the earth by itself can support one to two billion people.

But with fertilizers, with cheap energy, we can support eight billion people. If global trade stops, if there is disruptions to global trade, then at least half of the world is gonna die off, right? And that's, then that's really the natural sequence. It's a state of affairs.

Is, has what hap, has what's happened so far, has it, has the cake pretty much been baked at this time with the Strait being not entirely closed, but not as operable as it once was, has what's happened the last 40 plus days kind of sealed the fate of the rest of the world or not yet?

I think it's over. I think it's done. I think the United States has conveyed to the world that they're willing to burn it down in order to maintain its empire. Iran has signaled that it is willing to die to maintain its sovereignty, including destroy the global economy. So the reality is that for the United States to defeat Iran, it has to sacrifice its GCC. Once the GCC is sacrificed, then the world loses 20 % of cheap energy. You're gonna have mass starvation throughout the world. But that, but I think the die has been cast. I think we've crossed the Rubicon. There's no turning back.

Wow. Well, moving over to the Russian side of things, why hasn't Russia attacked Ukraine in this opportune time? It seems like the US is preoccupied in Iran. Why wouldn't they make a move on Ukraine?

Because I'm giving enough, because I'm giving America enough rope to hang itself with, right? America is intent on a ground invasion. Let the Americans enter Iran, okay? Once that happens, America is stuck there for 10 years. Right? So, so that's the strategic thinking behind it. So, so that's the strategic thinking behind Russia. Putin is probably the world's greatest geopolitical strategist today. He knows exactly what, what, what he's doing. He's very patient. He's very methodical. He's very strategic, very calculated. His timing is absolutely perfect. He's just waiting for America to go into Iran.

Why has he left Zelensky alive? Because he could have taken him out, couldn't he?

Zelensky is a useful idiot. He's not, he's an actor. He's a, he's literally a paid actor. Before the presidency, he was a comedian, right? So he's not the one in charge. He's the one who's just speaking on behalf of the Ukrainian people. Ultimately, Putin's not interested in Ukraine. Putin needs to destroy NATO. And that means dragging NATO into war in the Ukraine, which will happen probably next year, starting spring next year. And so again, it's like giving NATO enough rope to hang itself with, right? So, so, so that's a goal. Another point I want to make is, you know, another point that I will make is that in today's world, you don't want to defeat a nation state, okay? Because of nuclear weapons. What you want to do is putting pressure on the nation state that the population revolts against the government and causes civil chaos, okay? That's the end goal here, right?

And, and that's why these nation states are behaving the way that they are. No nation state actually wants to push another nation state into using nuclear weapons. Because then the world comes about. And so how you respond, you know, you have to, you know, is by putting enough economic um propaganda pressure on the nation state that it dissolves it basically tears itself apart naturally and that's exactly what's been happening in europe today where the divisions between the left and right are increasing uh immigration is an extremely divisive issue uh this one ukraine is extremely divisive issue over reliance on the american empires is a very divisive issue it's going to be very hard for europe to avoid

a civil war over the next five years what reverberations through these hungarian elections that we saw over the weekend imply for europe and the war with ukraine and in

relations with russia um so um this hungarian election what's been reported is that this is a major win for the globalists right this is another major win for the eu judy vance um who is clearly a nationalist went over to hungary to support um uh victor orban but look if you just look at this guy's past right the guy was a victor orban protege for most of his adult adult life and his political platform is the same as victor orban's right like reducing immigration uh less reliance on eu bureaucracy so it seems to me it's entirely possible that victor orban feels that there are certain reforms he could really push through because there's so much populist anger at him for whatever reason and so he's brought in a protege um in order to promote these uh reforms and this is very similar to what happened in 1992. so if you go back to 1992 in

america george h.w bush lost bill clinton what people don't really understand is that clinton was a protege of george h.w bush's in fact some people say like george h.w bush saw clinton more as a son than his own sons george w right so they met um when um clinton was saw and uh george h .w was in charge of the iran contra um and um and so the question is why would george h.w bush lose to clinton intentionally and the answer is because there was too much opposition in america to nafta uh to free trade with china right so if you go to 1992 the democrats were the party of dick gephardt who was this blue color who was his advocate for blue -collar factory workers and that was that was really the the base of the democratic party and then you brought in something like bill clinton to subvert the

democratic party from within right um he was a centrist i mean the guy was basically a neoliberal doing doing the work of the republicans uh it was bill clinton who brought in nafta who um pushed um permanent uh normal trade uh status with china who brought china into the wto um and this would have been possible under republican uh president

now most people don't know this but uh bill clinton before he ran for president i really was 1991 um was when he attended his first ever builderberg meeting sure and then you know the rest is history yep so a lot of this stuff is you know you can say he's decided behind closed doors it must the same way that you laid out um i mean it's you guys you guys can go check it out i believe it was 1991 or 1990 was when because he was an an unknown arkansas governor um up until that point but uh professor it's always a pleasure having you on my friend anything else you'd like to talk about before we wrap up here um no that's great thanks for the conversation awesome well uh where can people find you if they want to see more

of your work yeah so the best place to find me is on my sub stack uh prick of history.substack.com

that's where i write about geopolitics all right and your youtube channel right right yeah we'll link to both those down below so professor jen thank you so much for coming on my friend hit the like button everyone we do appreciate any sort of engagement that you give us um hit the subscribe button as well uh hype the video it all goes it may not seem like much but it all goes a long way in helping get this video out to as many people as possible professor thank you so much for your time we know you're you've been in extremely high demand um so we appreciate the time you've uh put forth and guys thank you so much for your time for watching and i will catch you all next time oh and type go professor jango in the comments section if you agreed what we had to talk about if not let me know i

do in fact read the comments so all right i'll talk to you later guys bye