I mean, America has become this debt ridden, financially speculative, you know, Ponzi scheme. So why would you put your money in America? So, I mean, given all the options, if you're a billionaire, where would you put your money? It's possible that America is controlled right now by transnational capital. See London, Paris. And what transnational capital wants are better investment opportunities. And what better investment opportunity than Pax Judaica, right? So you can make the argument that the financial elite is heavily supporting the Zionist cause, because they know that the Zionist cause will eventually lead to the Pax Judaica, which presents a tremendous investment opportunity for them. So you look at all the world's great powers, okay? And I think that they benefit from Pax Judaica. The American empire is now being propped up by transnational capital. It's a Ponzi scheme, right? With your transnational capital, you're kind of sick of financing this Ponzi scheme.
🔴 Prof Jiang - The NEXT Empire to Replace America (NOT Russia or China) | ‪@PredictiveHistory‬​
Source-synced transcript for the compressed reading. Spans keep the original chronology, timestamps, and audit trail behind the public interpretation.
So if a better investment opportunity arises in Pax Judaica, the money transfers to the Pax Judaica. The money transfers over there. And then America is allowed to implode. That $3,200, they can just default on, right? So I think that's a state of play. I think that transnational capital wants an implosion of the American empire and have Pax Judaica replace it. And then if you're Russia, of course you would want that. If you're Iran, actually, you prefer that as well to the Pax Americana, because...
You're watching Capital Cause. My name is Danny. It is November 28th, 2020. 2025. And my guest today is a huge fan favorite. It's Professor Jang back on the show. Professor, thank you so much for your time today. Thank you so much for coming on.
Thanks so much for having me back, Danny.
Yeah, let's just dive right into the action here, Professor. The biggest news item I'm seeing from the geopolitical front is this Ukrainian peace proposal, this 20 -point peace proposal that was agreed upon by both the US and Ukraine. We're still missing the Russian side in all of this. Is this the real deal, or will there be some sort of breakout to keep the war going?
Yeah, so the 20 -point peace plan is something that looks promising, but the reality is that Russia doesn't have to agree to anything right now, because Russia dominates militarily. Russia has the battlefield dominance. And also, like, you have to look at it from a Russian perspective, which is like in 2022 when they launched the special military operation they knew that it would not be confined to Ukraine alone they knew that this is this is gonna be a war between Russia and the American Empire Pax Americana and even if there is a solution even if there's a military solution to Ukraine uh you can assure you can be you can rest assured that the American Empire will eventually figure out ways to poke the beer to cause civil uh discontent um in Georgia uh to use proxies like Azerbaijan the Baltic States um Poland Moldova to provoke Russia so um even if Russia agrees to do
this 28 uh point peace plan which is extremely unlikely Russia still needs to prepare for a flare -up six months from now a year from now um right now the Ukraine front lines are scattered uh provokes has basically fallen which means that the Russians have a direct line to Kiev they can right now just steamroll their way to Kiev if they choose to I think that the Russians will choose a much more strategic calculated strategy of moving slowly um and ensuring their supply lines so I think this will be a very slow methodical Advance but the Russians have complete Battlefield dominance and what this means is that the Europeans will need to reinforce the European European fight front lines or face total collapse if the front lines collapse you have a political Revolution in Ukraine top of the regime um whatever comes next would be very pro -Russian and this will create a lot of
problems for the Europeans so the Europeans have no choice but to reinforce the Ukraine front lines and so what Russian wants to do is basically bleed out the Europeans you send in 100 000 troops they'll die out in a month you send a million troops they'll die out in like six months or a year um you know Russia has basically perfected this attrition Warfare which involves um drone reconnaissance um infantry uh uh probing attacks and artillery Warfare um Russia has um innovated and mastered 21st century drone Warfare so if you're Putin you're sitting pretty you want to just drag it out and bleed out the Europeans Americans and not give them time to um consolidate the forces and try another point of attack for example Azerbaijan or Georgia
Azerbaijan and Georgia Azerbaijan is interesting because it's kind of connected to both the Russians and the Iranians what's the significance of Azerbaijan now that it's also normalized with Armenia it seems like it's getting kind of quirky in that in the Caspian Sea because you one could make the argument that if you if Iran falls Russia would not stand to benefit from that because you number one their allies in in the bricks thing but then number two they do have a border on the Caspian Sea so a NATO controlled Iran would not be a very good outcome for the Russians is that correct or is there more nuance involved
look the entire NATO strategy has always been two strangled Russia right to contain Russia into isolated from um from markets so um Ukraine was part of that strategy but so is bonne so is Georgia right you look at it like basically try to create as as many flash points around Russia as possible so that they're always
on the defensive so they're always on the back foot yeah okay well why why is Europe now I mean you have france talking about voluntary enlistment for 18 and 19 year olds obviously this seems like a first step like a slippery slope here if they were to introduce the draft again i mean they wouldn't do it right off the bat they'd have to kind of finesse it in it seems like they're in that process of finessing the draft in into europe my question is is if russia could you know barely take a few kilometers of land from ukraine over the course of three years why are the europeans so paranoid over a ground invasion of europe yeah so that's a great question and i think a lot of
people are asking the same question like um like what's the big deal i mean there's a huge ukraine is a huge country it's gonna take years and years before russia can fully occupy ukraine and consolidate its um holdings well i think to understand that you have to look at the um napoleonic wars right so uh napoleon and france fought many wars against seven different nations and all these some seven coalitions were financed by the bank of england by britain and then you ask yourself why did i have to fight seven wars i mean i mean after australis when napoleon roundly defeated uh the austrians and the russians you would think that the europeans would be like you know screw this uh these wars aren't going to help us too many people are getting killed let's just seek peace and napoleon throughout this process was trying to negotiate a peace treaty the um the issue of
bilateral support of the european nation with a lot of popular research into the south and north is that britain is a financial party scheme that's the very basis of their empire um um so britain basically needs uh create finance all these wars against napoleon because uh britain cannot allow for france to consolidate europe because then napoleon can just block uh britain from um from trade basically embargo britain so um once britain was committed to financing the war it wins the war and it can exact indemnities on France right it's like going to a casino you lose a million dollars what well what you're kind of stuck because you want to go back to your wife and have her like bitch at you for the rest of your life right so you're stuck there and so you double down now you're two million dollars right then you've got four million dollars we're still you're stuck there
until you win it back okay and and that's what Britain did during the Napoleonic Wars and really could do that because the Bank of England Britain was considered safest investment so it's getting these the capital from many many countries and we're in the same situation today where the Europeans and Americans are both heavily in order to find this finances war in Ukraine how much they borrowed how much is invested it's basically a state secret right we'll never know but you're talking about hundreds of billions of dollars so it's a sunk cost of a situation where if you quit this war right now you're like hundreds of billions possibly trillion dollars in debt and who's gonna pay off that debt the European people you have a revolution on your hands so they're kind of stuck and said no no we're gonna fight this war out and force Russia to surrender and then all this debt will
be forced on to Russia in the same way that the debt from the Napoleonic Wars were forced on France and that's the entire strategy it's idiotic it's suicidal but it's history repeats
itself fascinating there's a city of London still have immense sway and power
in the London yeah it's a city it's I mean like the thing that well transnational capital is not all these financial centers are interlinked right I mean it's a big party scheme and it's all too big to fail so going back to the 2008 financial crisis you can see how all these banks were interlocked together so that so that there's problems in one bank Bear Stearns Lehman Brothers you you could have a contagion throughout the whole world and you could have a financial system if the American government did not bail out you know the financial system then then the entire system would have collapsed and we're seeing the same situation right now where it's not the state of London it's also New York it's also Paris it's Hong Kong it's Dubai they're all interlinked together and that's just the nature of modern -day finance does the city of
London still have because I've often heard the argument that the United States is still under the thumb of the you know the city of London elite is
that true when you're in your assessment um I think it's future certain extent so you go back to the Gilded Age right you look at people like Rockefeller Rockefeller was able to very quickly consult the entire American oil industry that's very strange how did this one guy how is he able to monopolize the entire oil industry in uh America it was just it was just that it was just not just um Rockefeller you also had Carnegie right uh who um monopolized it still and the answer is well because they were agents of the city of London um they were just um the poster boy for the city of London financial shenanigans right so the city of London had all this wealth and then it just invested in America because that's just the best place to put your money at that at that time so the city of London is extremely more powerful than anyone can
possibly imagine um another thing I'll point out is remember how Britain was getting rich China into a colony right it sold all this opium um to China and it created this massive drug infrastructure um that saddled the Chinese people uh the Communist Party came to power 1949 and then you ask yourself whether this vast financial infrastructure that supported this drug trade where did it go right because it's not just um selling the opium you still have to launder the money you still have to invest some money I think well the answer is it didn't go anywhere it just you went went went to other markets so you can make the argument that the entire global drug drug trade is controlled and financed by the city of London and that would be a legitimate argument um but but going into specifics like how much you actually control what other mechanics I could possibly tell
you right and now you have the Shanghai exchange is this is Shanghai a legitimate I mean obviously it is but have uh are the Western elites uh predisposed to working with the elites in Shanghai or how how is that configuration playing out today
yeah so um I think you have a transnational capital you're gonna play both sides right you can look at multiple options different possibilities and you have you you're gonna have your um uh eggs in different baskets right so if you're a venture capitalist you're obviously not gonna put all your money into one firm you're gonna have like like thousands of different firms where you put your millions of dollars so um so there's much more interconnectedness between China and the West than people um believe or or or can appreciate I mean their kids right go to the same schools they go to the same league schools Oxford uh Cambridge LSD they go to the same private schools they're all best friends um so they're all interconnected um the thing about international capital is it's opportunistic it's speculative right so if America doesn't work out then you have to look at other markets possibly China uh possibly
Israel I I think like if I were transnational capital I would uh be more optimistic about Israel the Middle East uh rather than China why is that well okay um um first of all Israel is a safe bet why because that's nuclear weapons and no one else in the Middle East has nuclear weapons okay that's point one um if I put a billion dollars in Israel I don't think that a foreign power like Turkey will be able to overrun Israel and take my money okay Israel is a lot more powerful than people give it credit for so go back you know to the Hezbollah pager attacks right when um you know these Hezbollah individuals had pagers and then it blew up on them and I think it shocked people but if you go actually into the mechanics actually doing this you come to you come to the radical conclusion that this really is basically control
the global supply chain and that's how they're able to pull it off because remember the pager attack is something that we know about but we don't know about other um other possibilities so one so what I've heard and I think I think it's a very um um strong possibility is that they should at least have control over VPNs right so the VPNs to access information um they control that so they're able to filter information to their ends so uh this really is um have always been dominant in IT um you know I I'm not sure if you've been to Israel but a lot of their schools at the 10 Neon produce basically the most amazing computer engineers in the world and they've gone on to start these amazing startups but not only that but the Israelis are willing to go throughout the entire world Africa um South America because they have these um Jewish diaspora Zionist networks in those countries countries.
So Israel is a global IT superpower that controls a lot of the IT infrastructure throughout the world. And that's something that is very secretive. That's point two. Point three, of course, is, okay, so how do you control the world? Well, before we would think that, you know, Britain controlled the world through its navy, the Romans controlled the world through its roads and its infantry. America controls the world through air power. But nowadays, you don't need military. You just need blackmail, targeted assassinations, intelligence. And who's really good at that? Mossad is really good at that. In fact, you could argue that Mossad has the best intelligence network in the world. You could also argue that Mossad has infiltrated its enemies to the extent that is unimaginable to the ordinary citizen. So you look at Turkey, you look at Egypt, you look at the Gulf states. Well, why isn't, why haven't they waken up to the threat of Israel?
I mean, why is that? So Mossad's very good at getting its way throughout the world. I'm sure everyone knows about the Jeffrey Epstein case. But remember, this is just one of like thousands of these guys around the world. So I'm just saying from an investor perspective, given the power and reach and influence of Israel, I would say it's the best bet financially for the next 20 years. I mean, I wouldn't put my money in America because it's $3,200 in debt. It's like, like, you could have a civil war the very next day. The political system is dysfunctional. The idea of bringing back manufacturing to America is just absurd. Like who are going to get to work the factories? Who are going to get to finance these factories? I mean, America has become this debt ridden, financial speculative, you know, Ponzi scheme. So why would you put your money in America?
So, I mean, given all the options, if you're a billionaire, where would you put your money?
And it's in the Levant too. And I mean, you're, I mean, you're obviously a student of history.
Explain to us the significance of the Levant. Right. So the Levant has always been a center of the world's trade. Okay. Why? Because the Levant is a nexus of Egypt, which has traditionally been the wealthiest part of the world. Then you have Mesopotamia, the cradle civilization. And then to the north, you have Anatolia, modern day Turkey. And then you go, you go to the sea of the Aegean Mediterranean. And this part of the world, it has historically been the wealthiest part of the world. And whoever controls that area controls global trade. And historically you made your money by controlling trade access. And that's why the Levant has been so heavily contested for millennia. So if Israel, sorry, if Israel is able to control the Levant, what it's going to do is build the Ben -Gurion canal. Okay. That's why Gaza is so important because the Ben -Gurion, the Ben -Gurion canal runs through Gaza, but
not only that, but off Gaza are these tons and tons of dollars of natural gas in the sea. And if you control the Levant, basically everyone has to pay your tax. Everyone has to pay your toll, right? So Israel becomes the wealthiest part of the world. And remember also that because America's war on terror, Syria, Iraq, Libya are destroyed. It's heavily depopulated. So you basically have this blank check to do whatever you want. Right? And if you're an investor, you're much better off building in virgin territory, because it's cheaper, uh, than you are trying to, uh, remove people. Um, and the, it's really is how violently, uh, evicted a lot of people from Palestine. Right? So, uh, Jared Kushner has talked about Gaza is prime waterfront territory and he, and he's being very serious. I mean, he's a real estate investor. That's all, that's all he thinks about. Like, how do I turn this real estate into a lucrative property?
And he's absolutely right. Gaza, it can be very lucrative.
What about the prospects of, uh, of a China led future? Do you, cause I've heard the proposition of packs Judaica before, but w but how does the likes of China and bricks fit into all of this?
Okay. Um, to be an empire, you have to have Imperial ambitions. Um, and the Israelis have always had impaired ambitions. You can, you can make the argument that the Zionist project is an Imperial project and people have called it a, a, um, set of colonial project, right? Because you have these, um, what Europeans coming in to displace the semantic population. Um, so, so issue has always been a imperialist project and it was founded as such. Um, it's entire ideology, um, its entire, um, geopolitical outlook, its entire people is geared towards that. If you go to Israel, I, I, I went to Israel 10 years ago and it really is the most innovative place in the middle East. I went to the technique on for, for a week. I was invited by the professors. Um, and I, and I had very long discussions about their curriculum. I, I used to be an educator and, um, the things they were doing was just amazing.
And they told me like they could be so innovative because Israel is in the middle of a desert with nothing with earthquakes. They're forced to constantly innovate. But now that they've innovated, they can actually take their innovations of water desalination plants of smart cities that, that are able to recycle water, these, um, data centers, uh, that are, that empower like a surveillance state, be able to take that and scale it across the middle East. If you're an investor, you got the $200. That's the best investment in the world. It's a lot better than investing in like, um, like open AI and this chat GPT thing that actually, even knows how, how to monetize. Right. So, um, so, so, so Israel is clearly an Imperial, uh, project. China was, has never been Imperial and it's, you know, thousands of years of history. China has always been protected by natural geography.
So, um, to the North or the deserts to the, um, East is, is the China sea to the South of the jungles of Southeast Asia to the West, um, or the, or the Himalayas. Right. So China has been protected by its geography. And therefore, we have developed a very insular isolation, isolationist, uh, mentality. So the idea of Pax Sinica, that's a Western concept. It's not a Chinese concept. No one talks about it in China.
It's fascinating because you, the way it's kind of made out here is that multipolarity is the future, but you're thinking, I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but you're thinking of another chapter of a major world power, a unipolar world in this case, a Pax Judica taking shape is multipolarity still in, in play here in your estimation or, or, or not.
Yeah. So, um, okay. Um, I think that there are a lot of constraints to the greater Israel project. I mean, first of all, they have a very small population, um, only about 8 million people. And the other thing is that, um, the Laval is extremely, extremely unstable. Right. Um, so, um, I can't really, um, I can't really, um, I can't really make the prediction that Pax Judica will replace Pax Americana. I can certainly make the prediction that Pax Judica will control the middle East. And then you can say, well, that's all that matters. Right. And then you ask yourself, well, then who would, who would, who could possibly stop Pax Judica? If I'm Russia, if I'm Putin, I welcome Pax Judica. Why? Because after this war in Ukraine is over, I control a third of the world's carbohydrates. And where's my market? My market is Africa.
Do I really want to set up, um, trade networks in Africa? Um, piecemeal, um, and ad hoc, or would I just rather trade with Israel and let Israel value process my carbohydrates and then sell it to the middle East and sell it to Africa? Um, energy, right? Let, why don't I just transfer my energy through Israel and let them deal with these trade networks in Africa? Because I don't, I don't deal with them. So Russia and Putin would welcome Pax Judica. China would welcome Pax Judica because you're going to need people to build Pax Judica. Right. So think of high -speed rails, think of, um, new infrastructure, think of data centers to power your AI surveillance state. Right. Well, who's very good at doing that. Chinese are very good at doing that. Right. So, um, this release would welcome millions of Chinese workers to help build up Pax, um, Judica.
Would America welcome that? I think Americans would welcome that because Americans don't want to deal with the middle East anymore. You know, like, like if America could like retreat from the middle East and never deal with like Iran, and Iraq and, and these countries anymore, I think Americans would be happy to, um, also we have to remember that ultimately it's possible that America is controlled right now by transnational capital, um, city of London, Paris, and what transnational capital wants are better investment opportunities and what better investment opportunity than Pax Judica. Right. So you can make the argument that, um, that the financial elite is heavily supporting the Zionist cause because they know that the Zionist cause will eventually contribute to the Pax Judica, which presents a tremendous investment opportunity for them. So you look at all the world's great powers. Okay. And I think that they benefited from Pax Judica. Also, we have to remember that while
this is happening, you're gonna have massive internal tour, uh, turmoil, political, uh, revolution throughout the Western world. Um, you look at Europe, Europe, Europe is on the brink of revolution. Okay. You, you have all these millions of immigrants that have, that have destroyed the, uh, social fabric, uh, Britain, you know, there's, there's, there were these race riots in Britain last year. Um, so these, um, countries are probably gonna face massive political revolt over the next few years. Plus you're gonna lose this war in Ukraine. Okay. And then America is also on the brink of civil war. Um, you know, I mean like next year when the Democrats take over the house, um, it's just gonna be complete political chaos because the Democrats will impeach Trump. And then you're gonna have a lot of, a lot of like possible political assassinations. Um, what happened this week in Washington, DC when a, when two national guardsmen were,
um, shot, um, you know, that could be happening a lot and this would, um, force a surveillance state throughout the country, which would force popular backlash. So these nations, these Western nations are going to face a lot of turmoil, uh, and political convulsions over the next five years. So, I mean, I, I, I mean like that, I think is just a political outlook. And that's why I think for a lot of nations, for a lot of investors, Pax Judaica makes, Pax Judaica makes the most sense.
Is, is that why Iran's been somewhat reluctant in signing some sort of defense pact with, uh, Russia here in this case? Now they've accepted this, uh, you know, they accept some Russian jets in the process the last few months or so, but how, how was, it seems like Russia is trying to play both sides here, right? In, in, in aiding and abetting Iran, but also in wanting to keep relations good with Israel.
Look, I mean, the reality is that if you're Russia, uh, your enemy is the United States, your enemy is the American empire. Pax Judaica replaces the American empire. In fact, Pax Judaica, um, would accelerate the demise of the American empire because the American empire is now being, uh, propped up by transnational. Capital. It's a Ponzi scheme, right? With your, your transnational capital, you're kind of sick of financing this Ponzi scheme. So if a better investment opportunity arises in Pax Judaica, the money transfers over there and then America is allowed to implode that $3,200 they can just default on. Right. Um, so, so, so I think that's a state of play. I, I think that transnational capital wants an implosion of the American empire and have, uh, Pax Judaica replace it. And then if you're Russia, of course you would want that. If you're Iran, actually you prefer that as well to the Pax Americana
because look, I mean, if you just read the Bible, um, this, the Jewish people have always thought highly of the Persian people. Uh, Cyrus, Cyrus, the great is, it was the Jewish Messiah. Um, and it was the Persians who allowed the, uh, Jews to return from the Babylon, Babylonian activity to rebuild their second temple. So, uh, historically the Jews and the Persians have gone along very well. And I think that once America is out of the equation, then Iran and Israel could come to negotiate negotiating table and negotiate a everlasting peace. But the trick is how do you get America out of that region? And I would bet that, um, they could possibly engineer a war between America and Iran so that America loses this war and Iran is, uh, hobbled. Um, and it's not in a position to challenge Pax Judaica. Certainly from an Israeli perspective, that's the best case.
Interesting. Is Venezuela at all connected to this South America at all connected to this, or is that its own kind of realm?
You know, I've actually no idea what's happening in Venezuela, but I will say this. I think it's very, very unlikely that Trump will initiate a military confrontation with Venezuela. I don't think Trump's that sort of personality. And if you just look at it from a geopolitical game theory, military perspective, it actually makes no sense to strike at Venezuela. All right. So let's say you conduct a couple of airstrikes. What do you get from that? Because all you do is you basically emboldened the regime. Uh, you unify the people behind Maduro and also you antagonize the entire Latin American, uh, Caribbean region against you, right? Cuba, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, they're more emboldened. Um, the entire South America region would, would think that America is on a, um, imperialist project. And so you benefit. All from striking, uh, Venezuela. Regime change is not possible because America doesn't have the ground troops, um, to, um, force a regime change.
And, um, Venezuela is a mountainous region, which, and Americans are not good at fighting, um, again, in mountains. They're good at fighting in deserts because of their air power, but mountains would be guerrilla warfare and you would see a lot of American casualties. And therefore you would see a popular political revolt in America. There'll be no support for a strike in Venezuela. So I think the best explanation for what's happening in Venezuela is posturing. I think Trump is trying to negotiate a deal with Maduro. Uh, why? Because if America goes to war with Iran, then America needs to secure another supply of oil because the middle East is on fire and Venezuela has the world's, um, largest proven oil reserves. So, you know, this fits into Trump's character because if you just read art of the deal, that's just how he negotiates, you know, he, you know, like the first thing you do is
pretend you're gorilla and, and threaten, uh, the counterparty, and then you calm down and slowly, you know, reach a deal. But, uh, for Trump, what's really important is posturing.
Hey guys, quick pause from the podcast, but this is something I feel is really important to let you in on back in 2020, before I even started this channel, looking for an edge, a way to find the big opportunities. Most investors never even hear about. That's when I found capitalist exploits insider from day one, it felt like I suddenly had my own team of world -class market pros working for me, digging up trades all over the world, doing the deep research and handing me ideas that had massive asymmetric upside stuff that I would never even think about since then my gains with them have blown past the S and P and the NASDAQ. And it's honestly the single best newsletter I've ever subscribed to him. That's not me blowing smoke. That's for real. I've interviewed their publisher, Chris McIntosh more times than I can count. In fact, my latest conversation with him is linked in description box down below.
If you want to check that out as well as the pin comment. And every single time, every time I'm reminded why I've seen a member for years right now, they're offering a special $1,000 discount on the insider subscription, but it's only for capital cause and viewers. So you're only going to get it by clicking the link down below in the description box or the pin comment. You're not going to find this anywhere else. Click the link, lock it in and start getting the same game changing research I've been using since 2020. Would China and Russia have any influence at all when it comes to us and Venezuelan negotiations, considering the influence that they have or the partnership that they have with Venezuela? I think that in geopolitics, there's an implicit unwritten rule, which is the Americas, the Western Hemisphere.
That's American territory. If you, um, try to intervene in the Western Hemisphere, if you're China or Europe or Russia, uh, that's an act of war. Um, you know, we, we've had this ever since the moral doctrine. So I, I think that, uh, all great powers understand that, uh, about this unwritten rule. So, um, you know, Russia and China may provide some support, but they were not intervened militarily against United States because that, that would be an act of war. Could they have armed Venezuela with their weaponry? Um, right. I mean, they, I, yeah, I mean, we see news reports of the Wagner group flying to Venezuela. We see, um, Russian generals, uh, flying to Venezuela, but it's not enough to stop a American invasion. Right. I mean, um, so I think it's more to, uh, bolster the confidence of Maduro to show his people that China and Russia, uh, and Iran are standing behind Maduro.
So it's a, uh, vote of confidence on Maduro. There's also a veiled threat in that, you know, if Maduro, you sell us out, you know, if you backstab, uh, backstab us, then, you know, I mean, some bad things might happen to you. Um, you know, um, Maduro's security detail is Cuban and, uh, Cuba would lose a lot. If Maduro were to sign a deal with Trump, right. If Venezuela would to fall into the American sphere of influence. So, um, it's a very complicated negotiation process. Is Cuba next? Um, so I think what Trump is, what's happening is, okay, first of all, it's posturing, right. So, um, you know, if, uh, America does attack Venezuela, it's gonna cost, um, you know, a chain of events that is basically unpredictable. So it's possible Cuba is next. Um, but I don't think it'll, it'll go to that.
I think, I think what's happening is there are a lot of things we don't know that's going on behind the scenes. So one thing that I theorize about is, is there a deep state conflict, um, going in Washington that we don't know, right? So because Trump talks about going after these Mexican cartels, well who finances these Mexican cartels who runs these Mexican cartels, it's a CIA. Yeah. Everyone knows the CIA is the world's biggest, uh, drug runner. Right. I mean, people say, well, they run these drugs. They do human trafficking in order to finance their shadow ops. No, I would say they do the shuttle ops, you know, in order to justify their human trafficking. Uh, uh, drug running ops and, and, and, and it's, it's all the same for a couple of places. operations. The CIA is the world's biggest criminal empire. So if you're Trump and you want a third term,
and I think that's a goal here for Trump to secure a third term, who's your biggest enemy? It's the CIA. And if you're Trump, you think it's the CIA that sabotaged the 2000 elections. It's the CIA, the deep state that cheated on behalf of Biden. So you need to neutralize this particular deep state actor if you are to have a third term. Otherwise, they'll just rig the election in 2028 as they did in 2020, right? And how do you do that? Well, you attack their sources of funding. You attack their drug running operations. And so maybe that entire fleet in the Caribbean, it's meant to threaten, not just the CIA, okay? Because remember, the CIA is also backed by the state of London. Because the CIA, yeah, they run the drugs, but it's the state of London that funnels, that launches the money. For the CIA, right?
It's interesting. You look back at the start of Trump, too, and he was talking about things like Greenland, taking Canada, taking Mexico. We haven't heard a thing about Greenland recently. What was the point of all that? And are they going to try and revive those endeavors?
Yeah, I think that's part of the plan. I think that for Trump, he has a clear vision, and it's the American empire, right? So as America retreats, from the Middle East, as America retreats from the East Pacific, it needs new supply chains. It needs new resources. It needs new vassals. And it makes sense to colonize Canada. It makes sense to colonize Mexico, right? Canada has all this wealth and resources that the Canadians aren't using. Mexico has this burgeoning working population that America will need to basically as a labor supply, right? It's very serious about eventually taking over Greenland, Canada, and Mexico. And how do we know that people aren't working behind the scenes to make this happen already? Mark Carney, he's not a Canadian prime minister. He's first and foremost, an agent of transnational capital. Remember that this guy who used to work for Goldman Sachs, then he went to Bank of Canada first, okay?
Then he went to Bank of England. And he was the first and only foreign citizen to be governor of the Bank of England. How does that happen? Right? So Mark Carney is clearly an agent of transnational capital. The other thing I would say about Mark Carney is no one talks about this, but he spent most of his adult life outside of Canada, right? And why didn't Canadians complain? And then that election was just silly because liberals should have been trounced. But Pierre Pallavé, the Conservative candidate, he just imploded. He's basically said, I quit, okay? He didn't give a damn. He just said, I quit. He didn't really try. And he gave it to Mark Carney. So why would he do that? Well, the reason why he would do that is because they're all paid actors. It's all one big theatrical stage for us peasants. And Mark Carney is clearly an agent of transnational capital. And I bet you that maybe people are working behind the scenes to pick up Canada, right?
Because Alberta has talked about secession. So I think eventually, America will colonize Canada. Though the they'll need to pick it up first. And then these different provinces will slowly be absorbed into America. I think that Alberta will probably be the first.
So you think Mark Carney is working with the Americans and Trump in this case? Or is that an over?
Yeah. Listen, listen. Carney was way behind the polls. Then Trump starts to threaten Canada, right? And then Carney shoots up in the polls because Carney is going to set up to Trump. And Canadians are like, Mark Carney knows the British. He knows the king of England. Therefore, he could save us from Trump. But if you do some basic internet research, you will know that Carney and Trump go way back, OK? So yeah. No, I know. I mean, like, like –
What's their history? What's their history together, if you don't mind me asking?
Yeah. So I mean, the reality is if you just look at the elite of Canada and America, there aren't that many. And they're all like buddies. They go to – like, don't you know, they same country clubs their kids go to the same schools so i think um i i don't remember the details but i think mark carney was an investor in some of trump's ventures so so they go they go back um yeah but this is some online research about trump and carney they have a pretty strong relationship and again if just if trump just kept his mouth shut okay carney would have lost so why did trump speak up right and said you know i'm gonna go and make canada and um we'll take over
canada right he kept he kept at it and then i mean so i'm trying to put the pieces of the puzzle together so we have pax judaica forming at the scene but then we also have the american empire retreating into a regional power and china and russia not really aiming for that pac's role in the same way is is that how the world looks to you right now like it's forming yeah so so the thing
is that america has no pair competitors but russia has a pick and bet it's called germany right so what's happening is that germany is um is is going under massive rapid militarization okay and then germany is very serious about this right so russia has to deal with germany at some point now china has to do with japan at some point okay so um so in this retreat america will ensure that germany and japan can be um the regional hegemon if you will right so america will support israel and then germany and japan and that's the game and and that's a play because when you retreat where do your military assets go right your basis your technology all that infrastructure you build up where does it go um and germany has u.s military bases um and so um america thinks that it can still exert hegemony in europe through its proxy germany same in in
the east asia right um america will try to exert germany in east asia through japan and south korea so so so that's why i don't think that there'll be a hegemon that will emerge in europe and in east asia because america will try to maintain as much conflict in these regions as possible and america will try to maintain its hegemony by being the power broker in in these conflicts by trying to but by pretending to be the peacemaker and and that i i think is their
strategy professor if you had to bet a dollar will there be armed conflict between europe and russia as well as china and taiwan and japan and korea and so forth okay so europe is going to go
into ukraine sooner or later i've said this on your show i've said them on on this um on every show i've been to because i can't emphasize it enough odessa odessa odessa that's where the final battle will be okay because the ukrainian front lines have been broken um and the nato will try to reinforce the front lines but eventually we'll figure out this is suicide i mean the front lines are so huge so vast and the russians have battlefield dominance so we've sent in 10 000 troops they all get massacred in a day okay so the only thing we can do is secure odessa and russia will move towards odessa because what because from the russian perspective the black sea is pivotal they need complete control of the black sea so they cannot allow nato to control odessa that's where the final battle will be odessa between europe and um and russia and i think
that this will lead ultimately to the death of nato to the you know to because i don't think nato can beat russia um the russians have proven to be far more military superior to the europeans and i think it's mainly because the russians are much more motivated to win this war than the europeans right if you're europeans like if you're just an average 20 year old being to fight this war in odessa you're like why am i going there again whereas if you are a 20 year old russian you're like this is my country this is my motherland this is my civilization i'm doing this to protect my my people okay so so so i think odessa will will be key i do not believe there'll be conflict between taiwan and china what i think will happen is that next year you'll see a major rapprochement between china and america there are four meetings scheduled
between trump and china next year um the big one is in april when trump will come to china on a state visit i think what will happen is this what i think will happen is that trump will trade taiwan for financial support okay so what's been happening these past 10 years is that china has been diverting uh private capital outside of the united states before if you're chinese private capital if you're wealthy like jacob you want to go you want to spend you want to invest in united states but trade war because of the political tension a lot of these wealthy people have moved to japan right so um what trump wants is for chinese to buy more u.s dollars right now chinese are buying gold um but because the u.s dollars are positive scheme you need chinese to buy up u.s dollars so i think that is the that is a
deal that will reach next year okay where trump guarantees the united states will not support taiwan independence and not only that but i think that trump and xi will announce a timeline for reunification for a final settlement of the taiwan issue where um taiwan will be politically uh returned to china okay that's my bet um but that does not mean to be peace in southeast asia because um america wants conflict between japan and china okay um that's that that's how america maximizes its leverage political leverage in southeast asia also um if you're in north korea now's perfect opportunity to cause as much trouble as possible in that region because just as united states and america are coming to peace just as china and japan are about to come into conflict you north korea you can be the wild card you can be uh the troublemaker why because you're not going to lose right you're poor you're isolated you're you you you know So why not just start threatening people?
Be a bandit, be a pirate, because that's traditionally what you're good at doing. And then people will have to start bribing you to go away. So that's my outlook for Southeast Asia.
Who is this new prime minister of Japan? What do we know about her? What do you portend she'll be up to?
Yeah, so I'll be honest with you, I don't really follow Southeast Asia politics because I'm not allowed to talk about Southeast Asia politics. So, you know, I don't really follow the matter. But listen, I'm in China and like this rift right now between China and Japan, it's really serious. We've been told to not go to Japan, right? So if you work in China, your work unit, your employer has told you. So we've received a notice from the foreign ministry saying that Japan is not a safe place. It's basically a very polite way of saying like, don't go to Japan because if you go to Japan, there'll be a black mark on you. All right. So this thing is heating up.
Yeah. Well, I don't want to get you in trouble then. Let's go ahead and, you know, wrap this thing up here, professor. Anything else you actually want to talk about that we didn't get into? I think we covered pretty much all four corners of the world here.
Yeah, no, we've covered the entire world, right? Yeah. But yeah, I mean.
All right. Well, great. Thank you so much for coming on, my friend. Where can people find you if they want to see more of your work?
Yeah. So I have a sub stack. It's called Predictive History. And that's where I write down my geopolitical analysis. So if you're interested in my geopolitical analysis, that's the best place to find me.
Interesting. Actually, one more thing just popped up in my mind. I know you and I talked about Iran possibly launching an attack around December. Or, you know, I've interviewed Trita Parsi. You recommended him to me. He says December. Is that still the case in your estimation?
No, I think this thing is going to be pushed back. So I recommend that you talk to David Miller. He's very easy to find. And he is a British academic that is very vocal about Zionism. And he talks a lot about Pax Judaica. You know, a lot of information I share with you about Pax Judaica, I got from him. Okay. So if you have a chance, definitely try to interview with David Miller. And he's pretty easy to find. So. Okay. So the situation with Iran. Okay. So where I think I disagree with a lot of geopolitical analysis analysts is most people think that Iran is being stealth -like. It's being passive. It's being naive. I think that Iran is just being very strategic. Because right now, you're finding the American empire, the most powerful empire in human history. It's going to take a lot to take down the American empire. So.
So you're so basically it's like a it's like a boxing match, right? You're up against a gorilla. So you need to wait until the gorilla is off balance when he's distracted, when he's a bit hobbled, when he's a bit hurt to land one punch that knocks him down. Okay. And that and so I think that Iran is being extremely strategic, being extremely patient in the matter. So let's just imagine a situation where America is invested in Ukraine and where America is in the midst of a civil war of some sort, basically just complete civil chaos because Trump has been impeached and all that. Well, now's the time for you to hit hard. Okay. So, so, so I think that Iran is ready to strike a punch, but it has to be strategic. So remember why Iran wants to do this is Trump assassinated the general Salamini. Who is their ambassador to the Middle East? That's a tremendous loss of face in that world.
Also, during the 12th day war, it's really took out a lot of Iranian top officials. Again, another loss of face for Iran. So I can go on and on over the slights, the insults, the embarrassments that Iran has faced over these past four years. And so why hasn't Iran, which is a very proud nation, why hasn't it attacked yet? Because it's looking for the right time. And when that right time is, we don't know.
All right. Interesting. Well, thank you so much again, Professor. We'll link to your YouTube channel down below as well as your sub stack. We appreciate your time. And you guys, if you got value out of this podcast, drop us a like and comment. Go, Professor Jang, go in the comment section. If you agreed or disagreed with any of the analysis today, do in fact, let me know. I do read all the comments. So drop me your thoughts down below and subscribe to the channel so you don't miss an episode. And by liking, subscribing, commenting. Doing all the YouTube stuff. You do help us in getting this channel and this video pushed in the algorithm. And so with all that said, I appreciate your time and I will catch you later. Bye. Bye.
Bye.