Core Reading
The key sentence arrives early: once war starts, it achieves a momentum and a logic of its own Source trail 3:41 Right. So once this war starts, it achieves a momentum and a logic of its own. So the United States doesn't really have an off -ramp. Meaning that if it tries to negotiate a ceasefire. With Iran, Iran would ask for repa... . Jiang is not saying every actor wants the worst outcome. He is saying the exits become politically impossible. A ceasefire would ask America to retreat from the Middle East, ask the GCC to imagine Iranian protection, and threaten the petrodollar recycling system that keeps American debt alive. From there the interview becomes a tour of forced adaptation: cheap energy disappears Source trail 7:5720:26 on the global economy right so um this war it will accelerate three major trends um and nations will have to adapt to a new reality in which energy is longer cheap and accessible the first major trend is de -industriali...The reality is that... Well, this war in the Middle East is having a severe impact already on the entire Southeast Asian economy. So India imports about 6 % of its oil from the GCC. Pakistan also imports a majority of i... , nations remilitarize, supply chains become mercantilist, and every society is judged by resilience rather than comfort Source trail 20:26 The reality is that... Well, this war in the Middle East is having a severe impact already on the entire Southeast Asian economy. So India imports about 6 % of its oil from the GCC. Pakistan also imports a majority of i... .
00:04-07:36
The War Loses Its Exits
Tucker asks for the trajectory of the Iran war; Jiang predicts attrition, energy shock, spread, and a ceasefire problem that threatens the whole dollar-Gulf order.
Tucker does not open with biography. He opens with Jiang's reputation for calling events early and asks the direct question: where is the Iran war going, how will it be resolved, and what consequences follow? Jiang answers by making Iran look like Ukraine Source trail 0:39 So I think that this war in Iran will be very similar to the war in Ukraine, meaning that this will be drawn out, be a war of attrition. Neither side will concede defeat, even though it is in their best interest to reac... : attrition, no concession, years of grinding war, energy infrastructure as the battlefield, oil as the global transmission belt Source trail 1:46 to $200 a barrel, which will have a really significant impact on the global economy because the entire global economy is based on access to cheap energy. So unfortunately, I think that we can expect this war to drag on... , and food and fuel shortages as the social face of the conflict.
The forecast escalates by stages: American ground troops, contested Hormuz, other nations drawn in, Saudi Arabia thinking about war, Pakistan pulled by pact logic, and the loss of an Iranian negotiator who could have authorized a ceasefire. That is why Jiang can say there is no more off-ramp Source trail 2:48 There really is no more off -ramp. So both sides are committed to a long war of attrition. And the consequences for the entire global economy are quite dire. . It is not just that people are angry. The actors who could make peace no longer have a politically usable peace to make.
Tucker presses the rationalist objection: the United States and China would both be hurt, so why not settle quickly? Jiang's answer is the central model. A ceasefire would require America to leave the Middle East, accept Iranian demands, and expose the GCC to Iranian protection. If the GCC then abandons the petrodollar, the damage is not local. It hits the American debt machine Source trail 5:31 reserve currency remember that america is sitting on 39 trillion dollars in debt and so the american economy is a punchy scheme that relies on um foreign nations to continually buy u.s dollars so the u.s economy would n... .
China does not rescue the system either. Jiang says China wants a ceasefire because GCC energy matters deeply to it, but Chinese statecraft is built around trade and noninterference, not armed-conflict mediation. War therefore wins against the interests of the people who would benefit from stopping it Source trail 7:17 as possible and for the straight who moves to open up um but unfortunately um as i pointed out previously when war a war starts it achieved a momentum and a logic of its own it's very hard to stop a war once it starts s... .
07:35-10:13
Cheap Energy Was The Arrangement
Jiang answers Tucker's two-year question with three accelerating trends: de-industrialization, remilitarization, and mercantilist supply-chain rebuilding.
When Tucker asks what the world looks like in two years, Jiang gives three trends. First, de-industrialization Source trail 7:57 on the global economy right so um this war it will accelerate three major trends um and nations will have to adapt to a new reality in which energy is longer cheap and accessible the first major trend is de -industriali... : cities are possible because cheap food and cheap energy are imported. If those vanish, people must return to food production and reduce energy dependence. Second, remilitarization: Pax Americana had functioned as the adult on the playground Source trail 8:57 between india and pakistan because these two nations have much hostilities against each other but now that america doesn't no longer has the aura of invincibility and inability now that the american military does that d... . Once America loses the aura of invincibility, nations have to arm themselves. Third, mercantilism Source trail 8:57 between india and pakistan because these two nations have much hostilities against each other but now that america doesn't no longer has the aura of invincibility and inability now that the american military does that d... : industrial states need their own supply chains.
10:12-20:10
Japan Is Not A Surface Metric
Tucker asks about a nuclear Japan, South Korea, and fertility; Jiang answers with civilizational posture, crisis resilience, and monopoly-driven low birth rates.
Tucker asks whether China can tolerate a nuclear-armed Japan. Jiang begins by granting the visible weaknesses: the oldest population, import dependence, vulnerability through Taiwan and Malacca, and a deflationary debt burden. Then he changes the measure. As a historian, he sees Japan repeatedly converting crisis into adaptation Source trail 13:1914:01 You go back to the 13th century, when the Mongols invaded not once, but twice. And at this time, Japan was very much a feudal nation. And the Mongols were very much a feudal nation. And at this time, Japan was very much...war of 1905 right and then you go to world war ii when america devastated japan uh not just nuclear strikes but also the fire bombings yeah so at the end of world war ii japan was completely devastated but in like 20 ye... : Mongol invasions, Meiji restoration, victory over Russia, postwar devastation, and the manufacturing miracle.
The answer becomes a wager. Given a billion dollars and a choice between China and Japan, Jiang says he would put all of it in Japan Source trail 14:47 with you um i would invest all my money in japan that's a fa what a fascinating analysis i i i I agree with you. I just, I mean, intuitively, I agree with you. But I just wonder if China can tolerate that, given the his... . This is not a spreadsheet answer. It is the belief that Japanese culture has some resilient, entrepreneurial capacity to cohere under crisis.
China and Japan then become opposite postures Source trail 15:11 Right. So, the major issue with China is that it sells itself the Middle Kingdom, you know, China, the Middle Kingdom. Yes. Which is to say that the Chinese believe that they are a universe unto themselves. What happens... . China calls itself the Middle Kingdom, a universe unto itself, agricultural, self-sufficient, insular, conservative, and focused on sovereignty. Japan is an island, resource-hungry, outward-looking, seafaring, and forced into the world. Jiang is not saying coexistence is easy. He is naming the deep mentalities that make the rivalry intelligible.
South Korea is the fragile middle case. Seoul sits within artillery range of North Korea; its economy is ossified around a few giant firms; its low birth rate is not a mystery but an incentive structure. If prestige, employment, and face all funnel through exams into Samsung-like monopolies, parents either have no children or concentrate everything on one child. Competition does not merely allocate resources. It teaches neighbors to see one another as enemies Source trail 19:52 Exactly. Because everyone sees themselves as competitors against each other. And you're right, you lose a sense of community, right? Because you have a lot of children because you want to contribute to the community and... , and that damages the desire to build a community through children.
20:10-25:19
China Meets The Energy Trap
Tucker turns from Japan and Korea to China, Southeast Asia, and Africa; Jiang says the energy shock exposes which societies can adapt and which remain trapped in the old cheap-energy arrangement.
The same model reappears when Tucker asks about China and Southeast Asia. Jiang says India, Pakistan, Japan, China, Thailand, and Vietnam are already inside the energy problem. The question is no longer who will be impacted. Everyone is impacted. The question is who can adapt to a long-term change Source trail 20:2621:19 The reality is that... Well, this war in the Middle East is having a severe impact already on the entire Southeast Asian economy. So India imports about 6 % of its oil from the GCC. Pakistan also imports a majority of i...-term change to the global economy. And I think that China will actually be the least resilient and the least ready to apply testing to this adapt to this new reality because for the past 30 40 years um china has got ha... in the global economy.
That is where China looks fragile. Jiang says China's wealth was built for decades on importing cheap energy and exporting manufactured goods. The official transition toward consumption and innovation is incomplete because AI itself needs cheap energy and Chinese households are not optimistic enough to spend. The East is locked into producing just as the West is locked into consuming Source trail 23:46 do any of those things or all of them americans use paleo valley to support joints digestion recovery Paleo Valley verifies sourcing and tests for pesticide, and that does matter. You don't want to drink pesticide, thou... .
Jiang's geography is blunt. The Western Hemisphere has abundance and can be self-sufficient. Southeast Asia cannot say the same. Africa, too, is vulnerable because food and energy sustain the economy, so the combined Ukraine and GCC shocks can become famine pressure. The new world is not equally distributed scarcity Source trail 24:2724:53 Yeah, and I would say, look, the East is going to be much more impacted than the West. Because at the end of the day, the Western Hemisphere, America, I mean, the wealth in the Western Hemisphere is just tremendous. I m...Right. So with this war in Ukraine and with this war in the GCC, experts are saying that in the worst case scenario, you could have famine in Africa. Because so much of food and energy sustains the African economy. And... . It is a test of who has land, fuel, food, state capacity, and adaptive culture.
25:20-35:08
The Gulf Mirage Breaks
Tucker asks about the GCC, Iran, and Israel; Jiang says the Gulf's safe-haven image evaporates, Iran's state capacity is targeted, and Israel benefits if America is pushed out.
For the GCC, Jiang's word is mirage Source trail 25:28 Right. So, unfortunately, the biggest loser of this war, regardless of how it turns out, okay, even if Americans were to win, the biggest loser is the GCC. Because for the past 30, 40 years, the GCC is basically built o... . These are desert societies with little fresh water and little agriculture that became spectacular because petrodollar finance, American protection, desalination, and modern infrastructure made the impossible look permanent. The war shatters that image. Dubai as safe, open, cosmopolitan tax haven depends on the belief that drones do not reach the hotel Source trail 26:44 But because of this war. And we're talking about like a few drones hitting hotels. It's really shattered the image of Dubai. And once you shatter this mirage, you can never, ever rebuild it again. So the idea of Dubai a... .
Iran is also broken, but not only by bombs. Jiang says the hidden target is the state's capacity to govern Source trail 27:15 So Iran is being devastated right now. So the Israelis and Americans are attacking. Critical. So the Israelis attack the largest gas field in Iran, the desalination plant was destroyed, but we also have to remember what... : police, military installations, special forces activity, dissident groups, water, agriculture, dams, reservoirs, desalination. Yet he leaves Iran a possible future. If Iran holds Hormuz, charges tolls, and converts Persian pride into unity, it can be destroyed now and still rise again Source trail 29:27 and to talk about 10%, which is generally about, about $800 billion a year annually for Iran. So the nation will be destroyed, um, in this war, but, um, it, but if it's able to harness the, uh, Clyde of the Persian peop... in ten to twenty years.
Israel is the beneficiary in Jiang's reading. He describes a Greater Israel ambition from Nile to Euphrates and says the war conveniently weakens the GCC, may pull in Saudi Arabia and Turkey, and lets Israel remake the Middle East. The reversal is that the chief constraint on this project is not Iran. It is America, because America guarantees the GCC. Source trail 29:5630:0131:01 Where is Israel in a few years from now?So if you look at the main beneficiary of this war, it is Israel because Israel has an ambition called the greater Israel project, which is what they believe that their God Yahweh promised to their, um, ancestor Abraham...
Tucker states the thesis bluntly: Israel may have roped America into a war to hurt America and get it out of the Middle East. Jiang says the plan can work because Iran is not Iraq Source trail 33:0734:04 Um, I think the way this war is going, this plan will work. And the reason why is they will, the American military has not fought a real war for decades. 2003, this war in Iraq was not a real war because suddenly Hussei...air supremacy very quickly and they rolled into Baghdad in a very, very quickly and toppled the regime. So that was a very quick and easy war that fit the American military of shock and awe. Um, Iran is simply different... . Iraq fit shock and awe; Iran has prepared for the American playbook, made itself nimble, and can threaten the bulk of American carriers with drones and hypersonics.
35:07-48:01
The Island Becomes Vietnam
Jiang warns that a limited Marine move can become mission creep, then turns the war into an eschatological problem involving Israel, Christian Zionism, Al-Aqsa, and Trump's uncertain role.
The military warning is concrete. A small Marine force might take Kharg Island, create good television, and boost morale. But Jiang's sentence is the trap: you can take it, but you cannot hold it Source trail 35:58 It would be a great boost for the, uh, for American morale. The problem is that you can take it, but you can't hold it because it's too close to rain and coast and Iranians can attack with artillery with drones. Okay. W... . Holding the island requires the coast; holding the coast exposes the mountains; holding the mountains becomes Vietnam. The first mission is small only before the map starts answering back Source trail 35:58 It would be a great boost for the, uh, for American morale. The problem is that you can take it, but you can't hold it because it's too close to rain and coast and Iranians can attack with artillery with drones. Okay. W... .
Asked what he would do as commander in chief, Jiang gives the only constructive exit in the interview. Treat the China trade war, Ukraine, and the Middle East as interconnected symptoms of imperial overstretch Source trail 37:10 Well, first of all, I would acknowledge that all these events are interconnected, right? So this trade war of China, this war in Ukraine, this war in the middle East, it's all interconnected because the American empire... . Bring Russia, China, Iran, and others to the table. Stop being the hegemon and become a willing partner in a new economic order Source trail 37:10 Well, first of all, I would acknowledge that all these events are interconnected, right? So this trade war of China, this war in Ukraine, this war in the middle East, it's all interconnected because the American empire... .
But Tucker immediately returns to the obstacle: Israel. Jiang adds Russia as another beneficiary, then shifts to the deeper force. Israel, in his dated reading, is not behaving as a normal rational state. It is overtaken by eschatological fever Source trail 39:04 Um, so if you look at the. Domestic situation in Israel, um, Israel no longer behaves rationally, it is sort of overtaken by eschatological fever, right? So if you look at, uh, videos coming out of Israel, there are rab... . If catastrophe is the condition for divine intervention, then secular losses stop functioning as restraints. Temporal matters do not really matter Source trail 40:14 This war in the Middle East, not an issue. What matters is divinity. What matters is our relationship with God. Yes. So what matters is faith in nuclear bombs go flying. Doesn't really matter. .
Tucker asks how this kind of extremism arose. Jiang answers through Christian Zionism, West Bank settlement support, and a much longer religious-symbolic history that he treats as speculative but operative: Israel, the Third Temple, Al-Aqsa, Gog and Magog, messianic age, and shadowy forces arranging events to fit an end-time script. The responsible way to read this is not as settled fact. It is Jiang's claim that theology has become an actor in geopolitics Source trail 41:2844:45 So, first of all, I, I don't think we can ever overestimate the influence of eschatology in American politics. So I'll give you an example where about a quarter of Americans are evangelicals and, and a lot of them are C...So it seems as though there are these very powerful shadow forces working behind the scenes. We don't know who they are, but it seems as though they're able to control geopolitics in a certain manner as to fulfill their... .
Trump's role is where Jiang refuses closure. He lists four possibilities Source trail 45:0947:18 That's a really hard question to answer. So let's look at different possibilities. The first possibility is that he's been employed as an actor and he's just following a script. He doesn't really know where this movie i...And Marco Rubio said this, where, you know what, we wanted these negotiations, but the Israelis were planning to attack, if they attack, the Iranians would be compelled to attack both the Americans and the Israelis, and... : actor following a script, man with a messianic sense of mission, president forced by Netanyahu's escalation, or compromised figure under pressure. Then he says he has no idea which is most correct. That uncertainty matters. In a conversation full of large forecasts, this is a methodological pause Source trail 47:18 And Marco Rubio said this, where, you know what, we wanted these negotiations, but the Israelis were planning to attack, if they attack, the Iranians would be compelled to attack both the Americans and the Israelis, and... .
48:00-54:29
America Retreats Into A Continent
Tucker asks about North America and Canada; Jiang predicts hemispheric resource consolidation, domestic violence, American resilience, and Canada as a resource-colony problem.
Tucker asks the question continentally, not nationally: what happens to North America if the world reorients? Jiang says America will need resources and labor if it retreats into self-sufficiency. That means, in his harsh geopolitical frame, pressure toward Greenland, Canada, Mexico, Latin America, Cuba, and Venezuela. Mexico supplies labor; Canada supplies resources Source trail 48:41 Right. So from a geopolitical perspective, if America is forced to retreat back into the Western Hemisphere, it needs to worry about resources. And so it is in the best interest of America to eventually take over and co... .
Internally, the picture is violent but not terminal Source trail 50:1250:52 And so unfortunately, America, it's probably gonna suffer a long, many years of sectarian violence, not a full fledged civil war, but maybe something along the lines of the troubles in Ireland. I'm not sure if you've se...Listen, Tucker, the United States is the greatest nation in the world. The people are open, generous, entrepreneurial, energetic. The resources of America are infinite. America is a kind of a fortress. So that... It's p... . Jiang expects draft pressure, riots, National Guard deployments, and years of sectarian violence closer to the Troubles than a full civil war. Then Tucker asks whether the United States hangs together, and Jiang's answer is emphatic: America is the greatest nation in the world, open, generous, entrepreneurial, energetic, resource-rich, protected by oceans, and without a peer competitor in the hemisphere.
Canada gives Tucker the moral version of the same resource question. Why is such a rich country getting poorer and weaker? Jiang answers as a Canadian citizen who still struggles with the question: Canada was never quite a nation state. It was a British resource colony Source trail 52:15 That's a great question. And it's something that I struggle with all the time because I am a Canadian citizen. I went to school there. So my answer is that Canada was never really a nation state. It's more of a glorifie... , and now, under financial pressure, it looks to him like corporate restructuring or asset stripping Source trail 52:1554:17 That's a great question. And it's something that I struggle with all the time because I am a Canadian citizen. I went to school there. So my answer is that Canada was never really a nation state. It's more of a glorifie...But hey, we want more Indians. So if it's not corporate restructuring, if it's not trying to asset strip Canada, I really don't understand the strategy for this. through elite replacement and immigration policy that strains housing, work, welfare, and ordinary Canadians.
54:28-68:07
The West Forgets What It Is
The interview ends with immigration, elite conformity, Western civilization, and the reversal that Chinese students may love the classics while Western universities reject them.
The final movement is the most volatile. Tucker asks why demographic and cultural transformation appears synchronized across English-speaking and Western countries. Jiang answers through Europe after 2014: wars in the Middle East displace people; Europe opens the floodgates; proud Islamic communities do not simply dissolve into secular Europe; cities change; social conflict grows. His phrase is controlled demolition Source trail 57:01 And so, that's one of the great questions. That we have to ask about the world we live in today. It seems as though it's almost a controlled demolition of Western civilization, right? The Anglosphere, Western Europe. It... , and he says he does not know the end Source trail 57:01 And so, that's one of the great questions. That we have to ask about the world we live in today. It seems as though it's almost a controlled demolition of Western civilization, right? The Anglosphere, Western Europe. It... for which it is happening.
Asked for precedent, Jiang says there is no real precedent Source trail 59:25 And back at home, you have these immigrant population that have not assimilated into your culture. Right. So it's a really weird strategy. And I don't know who comes up with this sort of stuff. And look, there's no hist... . Rome is only partial. Ukraine supplies his contemporary image: a nation already finished, Europeans talking about sending local men into trenches while unassimilated populations remain at home, and a strategy whose logic he cannot rationalize. The common thread is that Western elites appear to use their own peoples as expendable material.
Tucker asks how many Americans understand what is happening. Jiang's answer is educational. Elite schooling teaches values that cannot be questioned. Diversity is treated as an inherent good, but the classroom lacks intellectual diversity. The surface is varied; the thought is conformist Source trail 1:01:031:01:54 You know, unfortunately, I think. That if you are educated in America, you know, I went to Yale, Yale, and so I know a lot of these Ivy League people. Yes. Unfortunately, we've been indoctrinated to believe certain valu...Yeah. I mean, like there's different skin color, but if you actually look at the ideas that they engage with in a classroom, it's a very conformist setting. So it's one of these great ironies where. Yeah. Affirmative ac... . That is why obvious street-level questions become unspeakable.
Then comes the positive account. Western civilization, Jiang says, is not just whiteness Source trail 1:04:27 Look, so in my school, I teach great books. I teach Western civilization. I teach Homer, the Iliad, the Odyssey. I teach Plato, the Republic. I teach Dante, the Divine Comedy. I teach the Bible, and my students love it.... . It is Homer, Plato, Dante, Shakespeare, the Bible, and the question of what it means to be human, spiritual, and connected to the divine. He teaches these texts in China and says Chinese students, with no prior Western exposure, can fall in love with them because there is eternal truth embedded in their words Source trail 1:04:27 Look, so in my school, I teach great books. I teach Western civilization. I teach Homer, the Iliad, the Odyssey. I teach Plato, the Republic. I teach Dante, the Divine Comedy. I teach the Bible, and my students love it.... .
That makes the closing reversal painful. Universities should be the heart of civilization, like monasteries preserving the classics. Instead, in Jiang's telling, Yale and Harvard attack Western civilization while China respects its books. The West is destroying itself by abandoning what made it great. Tucker's final response is not argument but emotion: he says he may start to cry because Jiang's account feels true and hard to accept Source trail 1:07:39 i'm gonna start to cry on camera so i'm gonna i'm gonna take an emotional break here uh professor thank you okay no what i do not mean no no no i'm half kidding no it's it's emotionally resonant for me because i know th... .
Questions
Where do you think this war in Iran is going? How will it be resolved, and what are the consequences likely to be?
Jiang predicts a Ukraine-like war of attrition: no concession, energy infrastructure attacks, $200 oil pressure, food and fuel shortages, American ground involvement, contested Hormuz, and wider regional draw-in. Source trail 0:391:462:48 So I think that this war in Iran will be very similar to the war in Ukraine, meaning that this will be drawn out, be a war of attrition. Neither side will concede defeat, even though it is in their best interest to reac...to $200 a barrel, which will have a really significant impact on the global economy because the entire global economy is based on access to cheap energy. So unfortunately, I think that we can expect this war to drag on...
Why is there not an incentive to get it settled quickly, and why can't that happen?
Jiang says the ceasefire terms would threaten American position: reparations, U.S. Source trail 3:414:475:31 Right. So once this war starts, it achieves a momentum and a logic of its own. So the United States doesn't really have an off -ramp. Meaning that if it tries to negotiate a ceasefire. With Iran, Iran would ask for repa...Also, there'd be a chain reaction in that Japan and South Korea would look at what's happened in the Middle East and decide that the United States can no longer guarantee it's their stability, and that they can't guaran... withdrawal, GCC dependence on Iran, Hormuz security, and possible collapse pressure on the petrodollar system.
What is the Chinese perspective on this? Why wouldn't China step in and try to settle this?
Jiang says China wants peace because GCC energy matters, but Chinese policy is organized around trade, sovereignty, and noninterference rather than a conflict-resolution grand strategy. Source trail 6:097:17 and try and settle this so both the united states and china benefit from the status quo um and china has invested interest in seeing a very quick solution to uh this war in the middle east china imports about 40 of its...as possible and for the straight who moves to open up um but unfortunately um as i pointed out previously when war a war starts it achieved a momentum and a logic of its own it's very hard to stop a war once it starts s...
What's the connection between economic monopolies and low birth rate?
Jiang says monopoly prestige turns family life into a zero-sum exam strategy. Source trail 18:2419:2519:52 Yeah, great question. So when you have a monopoly, what you do is you create a hierarchy, right? Because everyone's trying to get into these companies because these companies are the most prestigious in South Korea. And...But if you choose to have children, you can only choose to have one kid because it's much more strategic for you to put all your resources into one kid than to spread it over three or four kids. So that's why an economi... Parents either opt out or put all resources into one child, and competitor consciousness weakens community.
If you were the commander in chief of the United States, what would you do at this point?
Jiang says America should admit the trade war, Ukraine, and Middle East war are connected symptoms of imperial overstretch, then invite Russia, China, Iran, and others into a new economic order where America is a partner rather than hegemon. Source trail 37:10 Well, first of all, I would acknowledge that all these events are interconnected, right? So this trade war of China, this war in Ukraine, this war in the middle East, it's all interconnected because the American empire...
What role do you think Donald Trump plays in this?
Jiang gives four possible roles and refuses to choose: Trump as manipulated actor, man with a messianic calling, president forced by Netanyahu's escalation, or compromised figure under coercion. Source trail 45:0946:1447:18 That's a really hard question to answer. So let's look at different possibilities. The first possibility is that he's been employed as an actor and he's just following a script. He doesn't really know where this movie i...I mean by that is, if you go back to during 2021, he was politically dead, right? Because during six riots happened, he was impeached twice. And then after he left office, there was lawfare conducted against him and he...
Where would you say is the part of the world that's most hostile to Western civilization?
Jiang names Canada, Britain, and Western Europe, and contrasts them with China, where he says people respect Homer, Plato, Shakespeare, and the classics as carriers of eternal truth. Source trail 1:06:52 um canada britain western europe i would say these places are the most hostile towards western civilization uh chinese people have tremendous respect for western civilization uh in fact in china's you know in the proces...