Okay, so good morning. Today we finished the French Revolution Trilogy. So we are focusing on Napoleon today. And my argument to you today is that Napoleon would not have been possible without Rope's PR. So to illustrate this point, let us do a thought experiment. I am going to present to you two individuals. And I want you to think about who is the greater genius. Who is the more rare leader. So let's look at person A. Person A has a perfect memory. That's the first characteristic. He is able to have instant recall. He or she is able to absorb all the information that comes his or her way and is able to retain it. Second thing is the ability to have priorities. So what's rare among... really smart people is the capacity to prioritize what is important information and what is not important information. To filter things out, okay? Because once you have the important information, you are much more capable of making the correct decisions, right?
Civilization #48: Napoleon's Empire of Myth
Source-synced transcript for the compressed reading. Spans keep the original chronology, timestamps, and audit trail behind the public interpretation.
The third thing is the strategic imagination. So a general is able to take all the relevant information that he or she has obtained and then imagine the battlefield across the globe. Across multiple nations. He or she is able to imagine how the battle will progress. And the fourth is the idea of flexibility. So even though the general has a plan, he or she is still flexible during the battle. So if the battle is not going according to plan, then he or she will make adjustments to the battlefield. Because he or she has total battlefield awareness. Okay? So these are the four characteristics of a great leader. Now, let's look at B. And B only does one thing. B is, I promote the talented. That's all B does. That's all B cares about. So who among these two individuals do you think is the more rare individual, the greater leader, the stronger genius?
A or B? Okay. So obviously it's a trick question. Okay? It's obviously B. Right? And so what I'm going to do today is explain why it's B. Because A is Napoleon. Napoleon, like Alexander the Great, like Julius Caesar, is a genius of war. He's able to completely imagine the battlefield and come up with strategies that are shocking, innovative, and unique. That's Napoleon. B is Robespierre. All Robespierre cares about is promoting and rewarding those who are true and loyal to the revolution. Okay? So today I will make the argument that Robespierre is the greater man than Napoleon. So to illustrate this point, I want to ask you a question. Okay? Let's just say that I'm a very rich man. Maybe I'm Jack Ma. And I have a huge fortune. I have a huge company. I employ thousands of workers. I'm extremely profitable. I have a son. He's 18 years old.
And he's expecting to inherit my company at 40, 50. Okay? But I say to my son, I sit him down. I have a very long dinner conversation with him. I explain to him, son, it takes a particular type of person to run a great company. It takes dedication. It takes virtue. It takes selflessness. You're a great person. I love you because you're my son. But you're not qualified to run my company. I have a team of experts who will replace me after I'm dead. I'm sorry, son, but you have to go do something else. Okay? Because quite honestly, I don't think you would even enjoy running my company. Okay? So that's a thought experiment. Right? Now let me ask you this question. I'm trying to ask one billion people. Would there be anyone in China who would think I'm a good father? No one. Okay? That's why B is hard. Because B requires a selflessness.
But not only that, but B requires the capacity to ignore social values and focus on what is good by itself. Okay? That's why B is harder than A. And quite frankly, A, in history. In history, we'll meet a lot of individuals like that. Julius Caesar, Napoleon, Hitler. Even today, there are quite a few individuals like A. But B is rare. All right? So let me explain why B is so rare and why Rose Pier was fundamental to the birth of Napoleon. All right. So we're going to focus on a battle. And this is 1805. Auschwitz. This is considered Napoleon's greatest battle. Okay? This is the battle that made Napoleon into a legend. This is something called the War of the Third Coalition. So Napoleon, the French, are up against three major nations. Right? The Austrians, the Russians, and the British. The Prussians will come in at some point to join the Third Coalition.
So Napoleon needs to act first and knock out both Russia and Austria before the Prussians come in. Because Prussia is considered at this point the greatest military in the world. All right? So this is Auschwitz, the battlefield. Let me first give you an overview of what the battlefield looks like. First of all, you have the coalition forces stationed on high ground. Okay? These are about 70,000 troops. Napoleon is scattered. Okay? He's got his forces here and he's got his forces here on the right. This is the right. And these are his main forces. Okay? This is Napoleon. He also has about 70,000 troops. So they look even. But actually the coalition forces have a huge advantage. One, because they're on high ground. Okay? Second is that they are coming, more forces are coming in from behind to bolster the forces. All right? So it looks in the beginning like the coalition forces will overwhelm Napoleon.
Okay? But, and so what the coalition forces are going to do is this. They see the right flank of Napoleon. It's weak. So what they will do is they will send a right attack and overwhelm the right and then come behind Napoleon. And then the other forces will come down to envelop Napoleon. This is what we call a flanking attack. Okay? So that is the plan. And quite honestly, this is the most logical, the most reasonable strategy given the circumstances. What they don't know is this. Napoleon anticipates that they will do this. It's a trap actually. Okay? Because what's going to happen is that as they come and attack, Napoleon will now attack the coalition's right flank. And as the coalition tries to muster the right flank, the cavalry will come in and split the coalition into two, forcing them to retreat. Okay? That is the master plan. The problem with this plan is the right flank.
The right flank needs to hold against the coalition attack. Otherwise, the coalition will just sweep in and outflank Napoleon. Napoleon has this plan where coming in to bolster the right flank is his marshal, De Vaux, with 10,000 men. Okay? The problem though is that De Vaux is 100 kilometers away. So it has to be a really quick march. To the right flank. Okay? Now, if he misses, the coalition will just wipe out this army. But he does get here in time. He saves the right flank. And then the rest of the plan goes exactly according to Napoleon's vision, his strategy. It is perfect. Okay? Perfect timing. Perfect attack. Everything is perfect. And as a result, this is exactly what happens. Napoleon splits the coalition into two. They're forced to retreat. And then what will happen is that Napoleon will sweep in and capture this entire army. Okay?
Once this happens, the war is over. The Russians and the Austrians are forced to retreat. The Austrians sue for peace. The Russians go home. Okay? So this is considered one of the greatest battles in human history. It is up there with Alexander the Great's battles. This is considered the defining achievement of Napoleon. And there are certain characteristics about this battle that make it uniquely Napoleon. Okay? The first is total battlefield awareness. That's the first thing. He is able to imagine an entire battlefield even before this battle starts. He knows exactly where each unit will be. Okay? So total battlefield awareness is what makes Napoleon unique. What also makes Napoleon unique at this time is the idea of speed. This all happens very quickly. Very, very fast. At this time in Europe, battles are fought slowly. And it's really like two forces banging against each other. Okay? But this is really fast. And what you have is a lot of maneuverability.
Okay? Okay? Usually in the battlefield, the army fights as one unit. What's amazing about Napoleon is he's able to divide his forces into different smaller armies that operate independently but as part of a larger vision. Okay? So Arsulet is the defining achievement of Napoleon's grand strategy of war. And if you go to military college, if you want to be a general, you will have to study this war, this battle, in great detail. All right? So the problem with this plan is that it should not have worked. Okay? It is a reckless and stupid way to fight a battle. Because there are about 10,000 ways that could go wrong. First of all, you need this guy, the Vaux, to come in. He has to do about 110 kilometers in 48 hours. This was before considered impossible. A really strong army, really disciplined, really well trained, will do at most 20 kilometers in one day.
Okay? Think about that. This is the best army in the world. The Prussians will do 20 kilometers in one day. The Vaux is able to do 110 kilometers in two days. All right? And that just shows you how extremely disciplined the French are. Not only are they able to do 110 kilometers in 48 hours, but they come into the battlefield fresh for battle. Okay? They jump straight into the battle, and they are pushing the coalition forces back. So it's an incredible achievement by the Vaux. In fact, if you study military history, you will see a lot of people are doing this. And they argue that the Vaux was the far superior general to Napoleon. Okay? Because it takes a lot of skill to marshal your forces and organize them in a way that they will want to march that fast and that quick on a time. Okay? So the first thing that must have happened is the Vaux had to come in time.
But you know what? There could have been rain. Right? He could have gotten lost. An army could have come in and blocked his advance. All right? So 10,000 things could have gone wrong. Napoleon was really lucky that these things didn't go wrong. Also, in this attack by the French, it was possible that the coalition could have overwhelmed an attack. So in other words, the thing about Napoleon that's really important is, yes, his strategic genius is one thing. But what really matters is the officers under him. Okay? He had a really talented bench of officers who were committed to the battle and they knew exactly what they had to do. Napoleon was the one with the vision. He was the one who had the courage and the boldness to attack. But it was they who executed the plan perfectly. All right? And that's the defining characteristic of the grand army of Napoleon.
All right? So let me explain to you how this happened. Okay? How was it that the French was able to build Europe's greatest army during the French Revolution? All right. So let's compare the Prussians and the French. And the Prussians, again, are considered, at this time in European history, the greatest army ever. All right? So they are run by the nobility. The officers and generals are nobility. And they are called the Junkers. This is very important. I want you guys to remember the term. Junkers. Okay? They are the elite of Prussian society. They are the ones who will take Germany into World War I and World War II. Okay? They are the force behind Hitler. And they are considered the greatest warriors in European history at this time, the Junkers. They are landed nobility. They have their land. And so they can focus completely on warfare. And as time progresses, they become the greatest generals and officers of Europe at this time.
Let's look at the soldiers. The soldiers come from France. There are three sources. The first is conscription. Okay? Conscription just means that you draft people from your nation to join the war. Second is volunteers. Why do people volunteer? Because you're often treated better in the military than you are in a nation. If you're a soldier, the nobility can't beat the crap out of you for no reason. But if you're a peasant, the nobility can beat the crap out of you for no particular reason. Okay? And the third, which is the most controversial, are deserters. So the Prussians have a nasty reputation for arresting people who they believe ran away from other armies, like the French and British army. And they are forced into the Prussian army. It's like basically prison. Now, they have a nasty reputation because a lot of these deserters are actually not deserters.
They just happen to be people from neighboring nations that the Prussians kidnap into their army. Okay? So you have these three main sources. Now, the thing that makes the Prussian army unique in Europe is it actually has very strict requirements for joining the military. You have to be tall, basically. You have to be like 5 '8". The average height was like 5 '6", at this time, in Europe. Napoleon himself was 5 '7". You have to be 5 '8". Okay? So Napoleon would not have been able to join the Prussian army. You have to be 5 '8". It's the tallest army in the world. The Prussian king, Frederick the Great, takes tremendous pride in how tall he is. How tall his warriors are. Okay? All right? So this is an extremely disciplined army. But with this army comes three fundamental weaknesses. Okay? The first is they cannot afford to lose that many men.
Okay? These men are extremely well -trained. They're extremely well -disciplined. They cannot afford to lose that many soldiers in battle. Okay? That's the first problem. The second problem is they're extremely slow. Why are they slow? Because the officers like to live well. Okay? So wherever they go, there's maybe like three or four different wagons that carry their food, carry their clothing, carry their servants. Okay? So this is a very slow army. But it's fine because every other army in Europe is slow as well. Okay? And so this creates a problem of inflexibility. The Prussians fight one way, and that's the only way they fight. They basically move up front, and because of the discipline of their soldiers, they overwhelm their enemy. They don't have that much flexibility in their army. Okay? So these are the three fundamental weaknesses of the Prussian army. They cannot afford casualties, they're extremely slow, and their strategy is inflexible.
All right? But it's not a problem because every army in Europe suffers from the same problems. Now comes the French Revolution. Okay? The French Revolution robs Pierre, takes charge of organization and personnel, hiring basically for the new French Revolutionary Army. And he makes radical changes to the French military. The first is the idea of a meritocracy. Okay. So before, like every army, most of the French army, the officers, the generals, were of nobility that were appointed by the king. They were loyal to the king, and as such, Rose Pierre saw them as a threat. Right? So he basically replaced the nobility with young men from the provinces who believed in a revolution. So at the beginning of the revolution, about 85 % of all officers, French, were nobility. Five years later, it's about 3%. That's a huge, huge change. Okay? One of these men that's recruited into the French military, and promoted really fast, is Napoleon.
Napoleon, by the age of 25, is a general. And that's unheard of at Europe at this time. But it's not just Napoleon, it's like dozens and dozens of really talented young men who are given opportunities. Opportunities they would not have been given anywhere else. Also, what's important for us to remember is that Napoleon himself is not French. He's Corsican. Okay? He's a foreigner. But because of the French Revolution, he's given these tremendous opportunities. Right? So that's the first thing. It's a meritocracy. The second thing is, it is total war. In other words, it is complete conscription. There are no volunteers. There are no deserters. It's everyone must now join the army. Okay? So now France has almost this end supply of soldiers. And that gives the French three major advantages. The first is high casualties. They can actually afford now to lose a lot of men in battle. So the French are now willing to take risks that other armies are not able to take.
For example, Austerlitz, right? Austerlitz was a huge, huge gamble that paid out for the French. But they were able to do so because they were able to replenish their forces if need be. Okay? High casualties. Second is the idea of mobility. Speed. All right? So now you don't have any officers where you can travel really fast. Also, your soldiers can just live off the land. You don't have to feed them like great food. They can just go and find berries or chickens to cook for themselves. Okay? So they are able to travel at least three times as fast as their enemies. That's an incredible advantage because even before their enemies are able to set up camp, the French have surrounded them and overwhelmed them. Okay? And this happens a lot during these wars. So speed is the crucial factor. And the third advantage is flexibility.
If you have an extremely dedicated army, what you're able to do is you're able to divide them into different units called corps. Okay? This is no different from the Roman Legion. The Roman Legion was the... main tactic of the Roman army back in the old days. Okay? So what you do is you take a huge army, you divide them into small armies. And if they're able to travel really fast, what this army is able to do is really quickly surround the enemy. Okay? If you surround the enemy, the enemy is dead. The biggest problem in war is being encircled because you've cut off their supply routes. They don't know how to respond to encirclement. Okay? So the French, for many years, was just destroying the enemies because of these three factors. They're able to take high casualties, their speed, and their strategic flexibility in battle. Okay? And who created the system? Robespierre created the system.
Robespierre. Not Napoleon. Robespierre. All right? So to give you an illustration of what the difference is, let's go to the year 1806. Okay? So the French have destroyed the Austrians. The Russians are in retreat. The Prussians come to battle now. Okay? And all of Europe is like, oh, wow, the Prussians now have taken the battlefield. The Prussians are going to overwhelm the French because the French are just peasant recruits. The Prussians are tall. They're strong. They're fearless. They're going to destroy the French. Okay? So for the first time since the Revolution, the Prussians and the French meet in 1806. Okay? It is a total and utter annihilation. Okay? Never before has Europe seen this. The French in 30 days wipes out the entire Prussian army. It is incredible to watch. Also, there's a very famous battle during this time where De Vaux, he's a court leader, and he gets lost. And he ends up fighting the entire Prussian army.
Okay? You know about this battle, right? And he's out number two to one. He wins the battle. De Vaux is able to win. Out number two to one against the main Prussian army led by the king himself. Okay? So this is a radical revolution in military affairs. The French, by using this system, is able to dominate Europe for most of Napoleon's reign. Okay? And what this does is, and this is really important, is because the French are dominating the battlefield. It forces the other European powers to make fundamental changes to society. Because of the French Revolution, these societies are forced to become more liberal and democratic and open and progressive in order to defeat Napoleon. So after 1806, the Prussians make a lot of major changes to society. Okay? What they recognize is that our soldiers aren't enough. We need to change the fabric and structure of our society if we are to defeat Napoleon.
Okay? So they make two major changes. There's other changes. But there are two major changes that are fundamental. The first is they abolish serfdom. Okay? Serfdom. Serfdom is basically like slavery, where the peasants are tied to the land. And that's the majority of people. When you abolish serfdom, the advantage of that is now you can have more conscription. These peasants are now able to come and become soldiers. Because serfs are not allowed to be soldiers. Okay? So now your army, the numbers have increased. And so all the armies at this time in Europe are increasing because they're allowing more people to join the military. Okay? And the second, which is most important, is the middle class. So before the French Revolution, all of Europe was an extremely structured, stratified society. They were really at the top. But because of Napoleon's victories, the Prussians allowed the middle class to join the civil service.
That's fundamental. Okay? They are now activating the energy of the middle class. And this allows for innovation. It allows for more economic activity. And so 1806, even though the Prussians are destroyed, it allows them to build a structure that will allow them to dominate all of Europe in about 50, 60 years' time. And eventually, they'll become the dominant power in Europe and the world, basically, before the beginning of World War I. And this was all possible because the Prussians lost to the French, and they learned lessons from the French Revolution. Okay? That's why I keep on saying the French Revolution was a turning point. It was a turning point in human civilization. So that is my main argument. Are there any questions about this argument? Okay. So serfdom. Okay. All right. So the idea... The institution of serfdom, it's basically slavery, where peasants are tied to the land. They cannot leave the land.
And this is important because, again, most of these societies are agricultural -based. So you need people actually to work the land. And as such, your... The majority of your population is not eligible for the military. Okay? Does that make sense? When you eliminate serfdom, now every man is eligible for the military. And as such, you can replenish your forces. And a lot of men want to join the military because it's a lot better to be a soldier than it is to be a peasant. All right? As a soldier, you are given rights by the military. Okay? Because the military is a very powerful institution. If you're a soldier, you can't be pulled around by anyone. Whereas if you're a peasant, you're a serf, I mean, you're like an animal. Okay? So if you give people a choice whether or not to join the military or be a serf, they would choose to be a soldier, even though there's a risk of death.
Okay? But with a soldier comes a possibility of social mobility and social respect, which is not available to you if you are a serf. Okay? Does that make sense? Great.
That's right. That's right. That's right. Yeah. Yes. So is it more of like a, like we're just a bunch of young men moving up in the world, and this is our new identity as a material?
Yeah. Okay. That's a great question. Okay. So at the beginning of the revolution, these revolutionaries were compelled by sort of a religious fever to die for the nation. Okay? And Robespierre became the role model because Robespierre sacrificed himself for, you know, for France. But in 1804, what happens is Napoleon becomes emperor. And once he becomes emperor, everything changes because now you're not fighting for your nation, you're fighting for your emperor. And there are a lot of French people who felt betrayed by Napoleon. So after 1804, this is really important, France is still the greatest military in the world, but it's basically a military cabal, okay, who run France. Napoleon is just the head of France. He's the head of a group of generals who love war, who benefit from war, and as such, France becomes a military nation where everyone's supporting the French military adventurism. Okay? And even though the French do win a lot of wars, eventually, because you're an empire, you just exhaust everyone.
Okay? But I will discuss this during the PPT, okay? All right. So thank you. All right. Any more questions before I go into the PPT? Okay. All right. So one last point is, why is Robespierre creating a meritocracy? Okay? The reason why he's creating a meritocracy is, remember, he's trying to create a new society. And there are a lot of threats to this new society. Obviously, the major threat is these foreign armies, the Prussians, the Austrians, the Spanish, who want to restore the Bourbon monarchy. That's a major threat. Then you have these rebels, these peasants, who want to restore the privileges of the French. They want to restore the privileges of the Catholic Church. That's also another major threat. But the main threat is actually the army itself. Right? Because remember, 85 % of the army is nobility. And there were actually a few times when the army wanted to march against the revolution and restore the monarchy.
And the generals didn't do that, even though they wanted to, because they were afraid that the soldiers would mutiny against them. Okay? So this was a huge problem for Robespierre, and that's why Robespierre spearheaded the movement to replace nobles with ordinary men like Napoleon, which gave Napoleon an opportunity to rise among, to rise within the ranks. Okay? Does that make sense? That's the logic of the revolution. All right? All right. So let us now go into the details of this, now that we've done an overview. So, sorry. All right. So the question we are looking at today is, how did a nobody, okay? And this guy literally was a nobody. He was from an island called Corsica, which was not even French. It was part of the French Empire, but it's not actually French. He grew up speaking French, but in a very bad accent.
Okay? So people made fun of him in school. His family was local nobility in Corsica, but they were poor. Okay? So this guy was literally a nobody. And in only like, I don't know, like a decade, he became emperor of France, the French Empire, which at that time was the main thing. The main power in Europe. So how is this possible? How did the nobody, Napoleon, become emperor of France? Okay. So for us to understand this, remember what the French Revolution was. These three classes, we've been looking at very closely at the French Revolution, and my argument to you is, it was a religious crusade. Okay? The irony, of course, is the French Revolution was trying to remove religion from social life. Okay? But if you look at what actually happened in the French Revolution, it was the ultimate religious crusade, where the people were willing to sacrifice their lives in order to build a new society based entirely on reason.
Their new god was reason. Okay? Another idea I want you to remember is that mythologies are prophecies, and prophecies are plans of action. Okay? So embedded in your subconscious are the mythologies of society. In France at this time, these mythologies included the stories of Jesus, but also the stories of Alexander the Great. Okay? And Julius Caesar. Napoleon saw himself as the reincarnation of both Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar. And he wanted to create a mythology that he was in fact the Messiah. Okay? So these mythologies are there, and Napoleon saw this as an opportunity in order for him to amass power for himself. That was his main insight. Okay? He was not a great general. That is one of the major misconceptions out there. He was not a great general. He was not as good as Niveau was, but he understood that the underlying framework for society are mythologies.
If you can control these mythologies, you can control people. You can become the emperor. Okay? That was his major revelation. Alright. So three things to remember. Mythologies are part of the collective subconscious. Okay? We are all in society governed by the mythology that we share together. That is the first idea. The second idea is that when collective consciousness, authority, breaks down, these mythologies begin to drive history so when you remove your teachers it doesn't mean no it's in charge it just means that now these mythology are in charge okay so think of the cultural revolution in China you could remove these authority figures but then your subconscious takes charge and the third idea is certain individuals will act out the leading roles in these mythologies and capture the imagination attention of everyone else okay that's why Napoleon became Emperor because he saw that the French were looking for Messiah and
he and he's like I will become your Messiah and he did that by acting it out but pretending that's in the great but pretending to be Julius Caesar okay and I'll show you how later on okay so that's a mean idea we're looking at today all right and Napoleon himself said this okay this is a very famous quote that he said while he was in exile in St. Helena okay so he's basically writing his memoirs he's reflecting on his life and he's not that perceptive he's not that bright but in this quote we see his his, his plan his like like how he became Emperor okay let's let's read this I saw the way to achieve all my dreams I would found a religion right he's not like I'm not a general I am a religious leader I saw myself marching into Asia mounted on elephant a turban on my head that is actually
in the great that's at Julius Caesar okay and in my hand a new Koran that I would have composed to suit my needs a Koran a Bible okay so that's what he saw so he understood the French Revolution really was it was a crusade to bring reason into the world and he would become the Muhammad the Julius Caesar that's in the great but Jesus that would achieve this crusade okay does that make sense he understood this from the beginning that's why he was able to succeed whereas Rose Pierre he may have understood this but he refused to act out that role all right all right so even even in his beginning the beginning At the beginning of his career, he was focused on creating mythology for himself. This is when he was first a general and was part of the Italian campaign. And this is a mythology of him leading his warriors into battle, okay?
This didn't really happen this way. It doesn't matter, because he understood that what matters is how people perceive you. The underlying reality doesn't really matter. So when he was emperor, he was focusing on a kind of personality, paintings of himself, stories of himself that would become the official history. So a lot of stuff that we know about Napoleon, his victories, we have to be suspicious about, because he was so focused on creating a myth of himself. All right, so let's go over some details that we discussed. So when Louis XVI was in charge, the French army had a lot of problems. The first problem was you had too many generals. 578 generals, 480,000 men. That's a lot of generals, okay? And the reason why they had these generals is they were friends of the king. They were incompetent, they weren't necessary, but the king liked them, and so the king promoted them. It was a way to ensure the nobility was loyal to you.
But that made for a top -heavy bureaucracy that didn't allow for innovation and change. Okay? So that's the first problem. Second problem is 85 % are nobles, harsh discipline. Soldiers didn't want to fight, they were forced to fight. No conscription, volunteer army, basically deserters. One -third were deserted every year. Okay, one -third of soldiers would run away every year. So that's why this army is problematic, okay? And that's why the Prussians, the English would defeat the French in many battles before the revolution. All right. So this man is named Carnot, and he is actually a friend of Robespierre's. They became friends when Robespierre was in his provincial town of Arras. They'd known each other for like a long, long time. And when Robespierre became prominent in the revolution, he asked his friend Carnot to come up with a new system of reorganizing the military. And Carnot, he's a mathematician, a scientist, he came up with the idea of conscription.
Let's call it a levy. They en masse. So let's get everyone to join the military, so as to dilute the influence of nobility. And it works spectacularly well. And because he's a mathematician, he was extremely well -organized, okay? He is one of the main conspirators against Robespierre because when he amassed power, he recognized that he couldn't really benefit from his power. Robespierre was too virtuous. He demanded on everyone making sacrifices. And so these people that Robespierre promoted, that Robespierre favored. Robespierre would eventually conspire against him. And one of these men is Carnot. And Carnot is also important because Carnot would make Napoleon a general. So the thing about Napoleon that makes him distinctive in the military is he's very good at coming close with political patrons. He's very good at identifying political patrons and getting them to help him in his career.
So as you can see, because of conscription, the French army is, is increasing, and that forces the other armies of Europe to increase as well, okay? So you can see the spike. During this time, because of all these reforms in the military, many young, great generals are emerging in the French military. So Napoleon is the most famous. But there are others who are actually just as good, even better than Napoleon, okay? Dozens of them. And these generals will become the core of the French military. All right? And all of them are driven by a republican idealism, okay? They want France to become a republic. They want France to be, France to be free. They want to spread the revolution all across the world. Not only are they devoted and idealistic, but also their soldiers. Their soldiers are willing to die in battle, whereas the others are, whereas other nations are not, okay?
The vow we talked about, okay? Without the vow, there's no way Napoleon could have won his battles. The vow is probably the greatest general at this time. So, so, Carnot makes Napoleon a general. And why is Napoleon given the generalship? Because Napoleon does the Carnot a favor. So after Robespierre's death, a director is set up to basically be the dictatorship of France, okay? Five -man dictatorship, which includes Carnot, and Napoleon. And then, also, Paul Barat, who is also another patron of Napoleon, as well as a friend of Robespierre, okay? And at first, after Robespierre's downfall, both Paul Barat and Napoleon are under investigation, because they are friends of Robespierre. But because they are extremely politically flexible, I mean, he is the opposite of Robespierre. Robespierre was virtuous. He's very cynical, okay? He's your perfect political operator. He's able to become one of the leaders of the directory, and he helps promote Napoleon's career. Napoleon helps them, because at this time, there's a mob, a Paris mob, that threatens the directory.
And what Napoleon does is, he fires cannon at them, okay? And as a general, you're not supposed to do that. You're not supposed to, like, actually go kill your own people. But Napoleon, he is ambitious. He's merciless. And he, so the directory owes him a favor, and he asks for a generalship of the Italian peninsula. Why? Because that's where Julius Caesar is from, right? And in the Italian peninsula, he wins a lot of battles. The record is mixed. It's not as great as people make it out to be, okay? But after the Italian peninsula, what's interesting is, he then goes to Egypt. Why? Because Alexander the Great went to Egypt, and Julius Caesar went to Egypt, okay? So even at this particular stage in his career, he understands how to create a mythology of himself, right? And so he goes to Egypt.
He says, okay, I am the new Julius Caesar. I am the new Alexander the Great. And it works, okay, because in 1799, Paul Borat, as well as Emil Csajas, who is now the head of the government, they get sick of the Republic. The Republic, it's corrupt, it's ineffectual. They want to establish their own dictatorship. But for them to establish their dictatorship, they need a general to help them out, okay? So they need the army on their side, and they go to different individuals. They go to First General Moreau, who is right now considered the best general in France. He's the most respected. And Moreau will decide with them, they will have no issues with their coup d 'etat. But Moreau, he's a staunch Republican. He refuses. He's like, no, this goes against the revolution. This goes against the legacy of Robespierre. I refuse to join in your coup d 'etat. So then they go to McDonald, okay?
I mean, at this point, McDonald is like, I don't want to talk to you. I don't want to do this. But have you talked to Napoleon, okay? And so they go talk to Napoleon, and of course Napoleon wants to do this. Napoleon's been dreaming about this. He wants to be the new Caesar who crushes the Rubicon and ends the Roman Republic, okay? And so what happens is Napoleon launches a coup d 'etat in Paris. And at this point, the great fear is the mob of Paris will rise up against Napoleon. But they don't, because Napoleon has done such a great job of creating a mythology of himself as a messiah, right? At this point, after the death of Robespierre, people are looking for a messiah. So Napoleon gets away with it. And then what he does is he knows that now that he's dictator, he needs to fulfill people's mythology of him as messiah.
So rather than just sit and enjoy being emperor, he decides to go to Italy again, okay? So the first thing he does, which is really interesting, is he crosses the Alps. He crossed the Alps, why? Because Hannibal crossed the Alps, okay? And during, in Italy, he makes a lot of really stupid decisions, okay? So for example, he had the Austrian army encircled, okay? So he had different forces surrounding the Austrian army. And what Napoleon was afraid of is the Austrian army would run away. But if you're a general in the Austrian army, you recognize that, the French are divided, right? So I just bulldoze them, okay? So the Austrians launch this massive attack against the French. And the French are now being overwhelmed. But the French have incredible discipline, so they hold the line, but they're still being overwhelmed because they're outnumbered, okay? Napoleon comes in with his elite group, with his elite soldiers.
And the elite soldiers hold their line, but 50 % of them are killed. And so now the Austrians are just bulldozing the French. Napoleon is safe because, the French army is able to come in and save them, okay? So Napoleon is taking all these stupid risks for no particular reason, and it's all to create a mythology for himself as this great conqueror. Because what he recognizes is, I don't have to win this battle because I control the government. When I go back to France, I'll just tell everyone I won, and everyone will believe me. But what's important is action, okay? I need action in order to create my mythology, all right? So after this Italian campaign, what he does next is, create a legend of himself as a new messiah, who will lead the French people into the promised land. Okay? This is the Battle of Marengo, where Napoleon showed up and destroyed, but he got lucky again.
And in 1804, he makes himself emperor of France. And this now destroys the revolution, because the messiah's not supposed to do this. The messiah's not supposed to make himself emperor. The messiah is supposed to be selfless, like Rose Pierre, and lead the people to victory, to free the entire world. You're not supposed to become emperor, okay? Because once you become emperor, you have worldly needs. He makes now his brothers emperors as well. He makes his brother Joseph emperor of Italy, as well as Spain. Okay? He then makes his other brother, so this is Joseph. He then makes his other brother, Louis, king of Holland, okay? So he's basically dividing all of Europe, among his family members. And obviously, if you are a French revolutionary, who dedicates your entire life to promoting liberty around the world, you don't see this as a good thing, right? All right, so the other thing about Napoleon, is he was an extremely selfish individual.
He was narcissistic. He was selfish. And the reason why we know this, is one thing that he spent a lot of time on, is writing letters to his wife, the empress, Josephine. Okay, so let's just read certain sections of these letters. So he writes to Josephine, since I left you, okay, he's in campaign right now in Italy, I have been constantly depressed. My happiness is to be near you. Okay, so he's obsessed with Josephine. He's a general, he's in charge of tens of thousands of soldiers, but every day he's thinking about, hey, is Josephine sleeping with another man? That's like literally what he's thinking. He's like, I know Josephine's sleeping with another man, and I'm going to be really angry when I find out, okay? That's what he's thinking every day. And we know because I don't love you anymore, on the contrary, I detest you, you are a vile, mean, beastly slut, all right?
So this is what he's writing to his wife, who's sleeping with another man while he's away on campaign. Also, my mistresses do not in the least engage my feelings. Power is my mistress. So this is a megalomaniac, he's narcissistic, he's obsessed with obtaining as much power as possible. That's what drives him. What he recognizes is this. In order for him to maintain his mythology, in order for him to maintain his image as a messiah, France needs to be constantly at war. So even though Napoleon could at this time just enjoy being emperor, instead he's constantly at war with everyone in order to maintain his mythology. Because the mythology is what controls the French people. If you don't have the mythology, they won't let you become emperor anymore, okay? And so as a result, France becomes the largest empire in Europe, okay? So the blue, the light blue, it's all part of the French empire.
He's controlled France, but he controls Spain, Italy, parts of Prussia, Germany, okay? And the problem with Europe is, as I mentioned in previous classes, the geography. It's very hard to control all of it. So Britain is still impossible to conquer. Right now, Britain has the greatest navy in the world. France has the greatest land army in the world, but Great Britain has the greatest navy in the world, and therefore they can never be invaded, okay? Russia is just too big to be invaded. There's still Austria around. And so now the French army, it is overextended, and people have lost their revolutionary fever, okay? They don't want to die anymore for Napoleon. So now the French army, they're fighting all these battles, they're losing a lot of men, and these men are being replaced with just common people who don't really care about fighting, okay? So now the French army is in decline.
The turning point, of course, is in the year 1812, and that's the year when Napoleon decides to invade Russia. And even though the invasion is a failure, he's still able to escape. The problem, though, is that in Russia he's lost his cavalry. He no longer has cavalry in battle, okay? So there's a huge disadvantage. Also, his soldiers are fighting a guerrilla warfare in Spain because what's happened is because of Napoleon's conquest, nationalism is on the rise. Before, people fought against Napoleon in order to restore the French monarchy, in order to stop the revolution. Now people are fighting against Napoleon in order to secure the national independence from the French, in order to practice their religion, in order to protect their national values. And so the Spanish rise against the French, Napoleon, but also the Germans as well. So now Napoleon is way overextended, and he no longer has the military that he once had during the revolution, okay?
All right, so eventually Napoleon is defeated. This is called the Congress of Vienna, and it will lead to something called the Consul of Europe. And this peace is being mastered by a man named Mennonick, okay? And Mennonick argues for balance of power. Let's just maintain our borders, and let's no longer fight any more wars. Because Napoleon, his wars killed millions of people. We are sick and tired of war. The people are sick and tired of war. That's why Napoleon was defeated, because people wanted peace. Now, so this Consul of Europe, this peace agreement, and we can think of this as actually like a proto -United Nations, okay? An organization dedicated to maintaining balance of power in Europe. It works extremely well. Napoleon was defeated in 1815 at the Battle of Waterloo, and after that, there's no more wars in Europe, okay? Until maybe 1856 during the Crimean War, okay?
That's like 40, 50 years. So it's an incredibly successful, incredible formula. The problem, though, is this. If you don't let people fight wars, what are they going to do? They're going to revolt against you, okay? So because of inequality, you have all this massive tension in society. So your options are either you take people to war and kill off a lot of people, or these people will rise up against you, okay? And that's what happened in 1848 during the revolutions, when all of Europe was engulfed in revolutions. We will study this later on, okay? But I want you to remember this idea. 1815, Congress of Vienna, Congress of Europe, Minernich establishes peace in Europe, okay? And they think this is a great thing. But then you have the revolutions of 1848, which threaten and destroy a lot of these monarchies. And so after that, what happens? You now have continuous wars, okay? All right? So that's what the elite of Europe discovered because of the French Revolution.
You can either have your soldiers go to war or they will revolt against you. That's your choice, all right? And so this will take us into World War I in the 20th century, okay? So the peace of Europe is one of the major legacies of the French Revolution. But as I mentioned, another major legacy that we must not forget is the increase of liberalism in Europe at this time, okay? There are many nations, that start to adopt French Revolution principles, okay? But there are nations who are forced to adopt French Revolution principles like Prussia, because they have no choice if they are to fight a war. There are other nations like Austria, which will adopt these principles later on, okay? So even though Napoleon will kill the French Revolution, and Napoleon himself will be defeated by the Europeans, the French Revolution marks a radical turning point in history, okay?
The French Revolution marks the beginning of liberalism, modernity, humanism, a lot of great things that now define our modern world, okay? We will not be living in the world that we live in today because... Sorry, we will not be living in the world we live in today without the French Revolution, okay? It is probably the most significant event in human history. All right, so let me conclude now by talking about these great figures that have emerged in human history and compare them, okay? So as I mentioned at the beginning of the class, without Robespierre, Napoleon would not have been possible, all right? So this chart shows us how. You compare Robespierre and Napoleon. Robespierre obtained his power through virtue and dedication. He worked 18 hours a day. He was completely dedicated to the revolution. He had no girlfriend. He had no money. He was not being paid for his work.
All he was doing was to ensure the revolution would succeed. And because of his dedication and virtue, the revolution was saved and it succeeded, okay? So without Robespierre, the French Revolution would not have been possible. He was a prophet of reason. He believed that everyone had the capacity to reason. So if you present a logical argument, people would understand it, okay? And that was both the source of his virtue but it was also the source of his downfall because he could not imagine that his friends would conspire against him because they wanted to protect their own self -interest, okay? And the third thing about Robespierre that's important is he saved the French Revolution. Let's compare him with Napoleon. Okay, who's completely opposite. Napoleon got to where he was because of political maneuvering. He was able to identify political patrons early in his career and he did whatever they asked of him. And then together they launched a coup d 'etat against the French Republic.
And after the coup d 'etat succeeded, he betrayed his political allies. He amassed power for himself. That's how he became emperor, okay? So Napoleon, he's a great politician. We think of him as a general, but he's really a politician. The thing about Napoleon that made him so successful is his myth -making genius. He understood that people are looking for myths and he knew how to present himself as a mythic figure like the Messiah, okay? And as a result, he destroyed the French Republic. Now what's interesting is that if you look at human history, figures like Napoleon appear always at the end of a republic, okay? So Napoleon killed the French Republic, but they have Julius Caesar, who is of the same personality, okay? Julius Caesar was able to identify political patrons very early on and outmaneuver them as they amassed power. Julius Caesar was focused on creating a myth of himself as this unbeatable general.
And as a result, he destroyed the Roman Republic. Later on, we will study Hitler. Guess what, guys? Hitler follows the same pattern, okay? Hitler was able to amass power because he outmaneuvered his political patrons and allies. We will study this, okay? Remember, the Nazis did not come out of nowhere. The Nazis were a force incubated by the German army in order to destroy the communist movement, okay? And Hitler took advantage of this. Hitler got to where he was because he created a myth of himself as a savior of the German people, right? And then he destroyed the Roman Republic, right? Why is this important? Because it's entirely possible we are living at another inflection point in history where the American Republic may be destroyed. Trump, okay? How did Trump get to where he is? Political maneuvering. Why is he president? Because he has a myth
-making genius, okay? That's really important to understand about Trump. Everyone's like, Trump is a terrible business person. He's lost a lot of money. Trump doesn't understand terrorists. He doesn't understand the economy. He doesn't care. He understands mythology, okay? He understands how to capture people's attention. He knows how to instill an image of himself as a messiah in people's minds. That's what he cares about, right? He doesn't need to succeed. He needs to act. And then he needs to present himself in a way that captures people's imagination. What does Trump spend all his time on? He spends all his time talking to the press. That's his job, okay? Do you understand? His job is not to think about economics or military matters. His job is to talk to the press and create an image of himself as a messiah to the American people, okay? So the question then is, okay, well, listen. If we see this
pattern, Napoleon, Caesar, Hitler are the same person, the results are the same, and Trump is similar to Napoleon, Caesar, and Hitler, what's gonna happen? I don't know, okay? All right? But, okay, and this is really important, if, in fact, in the next 10 years, it'll probably take 10 years, if Trump actually destroys the American people, the American republic, okay, then a pattern emerges in history, all right? And if this pattern is consistent, now we're able to control history because we're able to foresee and predict history, okay? So that's the idea. Okay, that's it. Any questions? Was this clear to you guys? All right, good. Rose Pier. Okay, that's a great question, okay. Why did Napoleon succeed where Rose Pier failed? Okay. Okay, so the difference is this. If I'm Rose Pier, I believe everyone is capable of reason, right? Therefore, you have a responsibility to reason for yourself. You understand? I will give you ideas, but you must come to your own conclusions, you must act independently of me, okay?
And Napoleon's like, no, no, no. People don't want to think. People want to believe. People want to obey. If I present myself as Messiah, and I tell people, follow me and I will lead you to paradise, people will want to follow me, okay? And people love this confidence, right? This charisma, this confidence of Napoleon. Think of Trump, right? Maybe you and I think Trump's an idiot, but if you're a normal person, you believe that Trump, he is a genius because he's so confident, right? People are attracted to confidence. Does that make sense? People aren't attracted to logic or reason. They're attracted to confidence and charisma. Trump tells everyone, follow me and the world will be fine. We will make America great again. And, you know, you're like, well, that doesn't make any sense. Doesn't matter, okay? What Trump has done is create a mythology that has captured people's imagination.
And as such, people are willing to die for this. Does that make sense? That's what made Napoleon such a great military leader. Because he had this confidence, and people just had to follow him, okay? Does that make sense? Okay. Great question. Any more questions? Okay. Myth -making, okay? Myth -making is, all right, there's reality. Okay, why is Trump a myth -making genius? Okay, there's reality, right? These are things that you and I see every day. And then there's myths. These are ideas that we have about how society works, about how the world works. Now, objectively speaking, Trump is a failed business person. His father was a great business person, Fred Trump, who built a real estate empire. And then Trump came along and took this empire over. And he almost bankrupted this empire, okay? And so, Fred Trump was spending a lot of his time thinking about how to make money.
Like, how do I make a great business? How do I hire good people? How do I motivate them? How do I steal more money from the government, okay? So he was focused on the very specifics of running a business. Trump is like, no! People don't want that. People want to see a successful billionaire, okay? And what's a successful billionaire? He sleeps with beautiful women, right? I'm going to find beautiful women, and I'm going to sleep with them, and the press is going to report it. And then people are like, oh my God, this guy is a god, because all these beautiful women want to sleep with him. Therefore, I should give him my money to spend, to invest, because he's a genius, okay? What? What people want is mythology of success. Does that make sense? So what made Trump actually really famous is a show called The Apprentice.
The Apprentice, it's a TV show, it's made up, and the show presents Trump as this extremely wise and forward -looking business person. And he's the opposite in reality, okay? But what Trump understands that's really important is people don't care about reality. People want to watch a TV show that's exciting, that's interesting, that's fun. So if I turn politics into a TV show and everyone's watching all the time, they will always want me to be president. Does that make sense? Yeah, because... Yeah, okay, so is perception more important than reality? And the answer is yes, okay? And the reason why is reality, it is very hard. It's very difficult. All right? People prefer simple ideas, simple myths that allow them to better navigate reality. That's why religion is important, okay? So what Trump's doing is he's creating a religion. He's creating a religion about himself, right? And it's really the same idea as Napoleon. Napoleon says this, right?
I saw the way to achieve my dreams. I would found a religion. I saw myself as marching into Asia, mounted on an elephant. A turban on my head. And in my hand, a new Koran that I would have composed to suit my needs. Magnet is a new religion, okay? Make America great again. Don't think of it as a political movement. Think of it as a new religion. And I will explain to you why Trump is so powerful, okay? I think Trump will be president of the United States for the next 10 years. It is very hard to remove him because, like, once you remove him, the TV show ends. You understand? Now you have to go back to reality. People don't want that. People want to live in a TV show. Exactly, exactly. That's exactly it. That's exactly right. People want to live in a TV show. It's perfect. Thank you. People want to live in a dream because that's what makes life bearable.
Okay? Does that make sense? Okay. That's a great question, okay? So the argument against this is, like, Trump is a terrible economic leader. And so with his terrorist war against China, with all of these policies, it's just going to make the American person more poor, okay? So less money to spend. The American won't be able to afford a house, okay? So this is really important. But you have to think about people's psychology, all right? So, sorry, let me write this down because it's a very important idea, okay? You have to understand people's psychology, okay? People are not capable of thinking in absolute terms. Does that make sense? Like, if I give you a bottle of wine, okay? This bottle of wine, okay? And I give you another bottle of wine. And I ask you to tell me which is better. You're not able to do it, okay?
But I told you this one is $50, this one is $10. You know this has to be better. Do you understand? So people's psychology is very interesting, but people cannot think objectively, okay? People can only compare and contrast. So let's just say, okay, trade war. The American consumer is losing, pushing power, right? So the person is getting more poor. But if China is getting more poor in this time, right? So U.S. goes down, but China goes down even more, people are happy. Do you understand? Okay? I know this is terrible, but this is true. I don't have to make you rich. I just have to make everyone else poorer, and then you're happy, right? Make America great again. Make America great again. Do you understand? Being great, it's just a perception. I'm better than everyone else, and then I'm great. I don't have to be wealthy. I just have to be better off than everyone else.
So the entire world is poorer. America is happier. Does that make sense? Okay? So that's the logic here. Trump doesn't want to make America wealthy again. He needs to make America, a myth again. You understand? He wants to create the myth of a great America because the rest of the world is either at war, or it's bankrupt, or people feel hopeless. Do you understand? And honestly, he's right. Okay? He's absolutely correct in this matter. All right? And that explains why he's doing what he's doing. Does that make sense? Okay, great. Any more questions? All right. Good. Okay, so we're taking a break. And then we'll come back from the break. We start the British Empire.